IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v36y2023i4d10.1007_s11138-021-00557-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property and popery: Is Pope Francis’s teaching on private property radical?

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Booth

    (St. Mary’s University Twickenham
    University of Buckingham)

Abstract

The importance of private property has been controversial in Catholic social thought and teaching down the ages. The approach of the Catholic Church to the question of property rights has been discussed by a number of Austrian-school authors, though their focus has been on teaching documents from 1891 to 1931. During that period, and up to the mid-1960s, the modern teaching of the Catholic Church on the right to property tended to be extremely positive. Since that time, ambiguities have crept in, and Pope Francis in particular has given the impression of being lukewarm towards the right to property. We discuss whether Pope Francis’s position is radical within the tradition of Catholic social teaching and conclude that it is not especially so, though his emphasis is more negative than that of previous popes and his reasoning not always sound. It is also found that the Catholic Church has left undeveloped the link between private property, economic development and environmental outcomes despite the interest of the Church in poverty and environmental degradation. This, together with the lack of discussion of the exceptions to the general rule of support for private property, is a real omission in Catholic Church teaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Booth, 2023. "Property and popery: Is Pope Francis’s teaching on private property radical?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 541-566, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:36:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11138-021-00557-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-021-00557-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-021-00557-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-021-00557-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:36:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11138-021-00557-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.