IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v70y1991i1p71-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elections and Government Spending

Author

Listed:
  • Payne, James L

Abstract

It is widely believed that electoral pressures cause legislators to favor government spending programs. This "electoral theory of spending" is shown to encompass two core hypotheses: (1) the electoral consequences hypothesis, which states that support for spending programs improves the representative's electoral showing; and (2) the legislator insecurity hypothesis, which states that greater electoral insecurity leads representatives to be more in favor of spending programs. A test of these ideas using spending scores for U.S. representatives in 1986 finds that neither hypothesis is supported by the data. Copyright 1991 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Payne, James L, 1991. "Elections and Government Spending," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 71-82, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:70:y:1991:i:1:p:71-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nabila Khurshid & Hamza Sharif & Mosab I. Tabash & Basem Hamouri & Asma Fiaz & Fozia Munir, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of Foreign Capital Inflows and Political Economy on Economic Growth: An Application of Regime Switching Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Boris Gramc, 2007. "Factors of the Size of Government in Developed Countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(2), pages 130-142.
    3. David Carassus & David Laborde, 2002. "L'impact politique de l'audit de début de mandat : une étude empirique des villes de plus de 20 000 habitants," Post-Print halshs-00584450, HAL.
    4. Christian Bjørnskov & Axel Dreher & Justina Fischer, 2007. "The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 267-292, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:70:y:1991:i:1:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.