IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v6y2006i3p277-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statutory Bodies, Land Use Planning and Conservation in Singapore: Issues and Challenges for Governability

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Francesch-Huidobro

Abstract

This article discusses the dynamics of state–society interactions with regard to land use planning policy and its effect on nature conservation where ministries and statutory boards represent the government and environmental NGOs embody civil society. It examines the role of three statutory boards in the campaign against the de-gazetting of the Lower Peirce Reservoir Catchment Area (1990–1992), and considers the impact of the issue on future relationships between the government, the statutory boards and the NGOs. Although the campaign did not appear to diminish the integration of the statutory boards with their parent ministries, the common ground that they shared with environmental NGOs was often at variance with the positions taken by the ministries. The tensions between integration and autonomy and between accountability and independence, and the ways in which they were resolved, have important implications for the role which statutory bodies can play and, more widely, for Singapore's system of governance. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Francesch-Huidobro, 2006. "Statutory Bodies, Land Use Planning and Conservation in Singapore: Issues and Challenges for Governability," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 277-288, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:6:y:2006:i:3:p:277-288
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-006-0017-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11115-006-0017-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-006-0017-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:6:y:2006:i:3:p:277-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.