IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v44y2025i4d10.1007_s11113-025-09965-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Workplace Gender Discrimination and Fertility Intentions among Married Working Women in Korea: Insights from Asymmetric Fixed Effects Models

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunseo Rim

    (Korea University
    Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs)

  • Keun Young Kwon

    (Korea University
    Korea University)

  • Eric Fong

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Jinho Kim

    (Korea University
    Korea University
    University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

Previous research has established a link between perceived workplace gender discrimination (WGD) and adverse psychological health outcomes. However, the influence of perceived WGD on fertility intentions has not been thoroughly explored. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived WGD and fertility intentions, particularly separating the effects of both increases and decreases in perceived WGD. Data from two waves of the Youth Panel, a nationally representative sample of young population (N = 638), were analyzed. This study employed an asymmetric fixed effects (FE) model to investigate the potentially asymmetric effect of increases and decreases in perceived WGD on fertility intentions, while also accounting for unobserved individual heterogeneity. The standard FE model revealed a negative association between perceived WGD and fertility intentions. Contrastingly, the asymmetric FE model indicated that only an increase in perceived WGD was significantly associated with a decrease in fertility intentions, whereas a decrease in perceived WGD did not demonstrate a significant association. Furthermore, when stratified by childbirth experience, the negative relationship between an increase in perceived WGD and fertility intentions was significant only for women without previous childbirth experience. These findings underscore the importance of considering factors such as the work environment and family life to better understand women’s fertility intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunseo Rim & Keun Young Kwon & Eric Fong & Jinho Kim, 2025. "Perceptions of Workplace Gender Discrimination and Fertility Intentions among Married Working Women in Korea: Insights from Asymmetric Fixed Effects Models," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(4), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09965-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-025-09965-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-025-09965-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-025-09965-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moon-Gi Suh, 2017. "Determinants of Female Labor Force Participation in South Korea: Tracing out the U-shaped Curve by Economic Growth," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 255-269, March.
    2. Peter McDonald, 2000. "Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 26(3), pages 427-439, September.
    3. Erin Hye-Won Kim, 2017. "Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(24), pages 743-768.
    4. Rim, Hyunseo & Kim, Jinho, 2024. "The influence of perceptions of gender discrimination in the workplace on depressive symptoms among Korean working women: The moderating role of job satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Magali Recoules, 2011. "How can gender discrimination explain fertility behaviors and family-friendly policies?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00675601, HAL.
    6. Arianna Gatta & Francesco Mattioli & Letizia Mencarini & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Employment uncertainty and fertility intentions: Stability or resilience?," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 387-406, September.
    7. Magali Recoules, 2011. "How can gender discrimination explain fertility behaviors and family-friendly policies?," Post-Print halshs-00675601, HAL.
    8. David de la Croix & Marie Vander Donckt, 2010. "Would Empowering Women Initiate the Demographic Transition in Least Developed Countries?," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(2), pages 85-129.
    9. Kim, Jinho & Song, Kyungeun & Sutin, Angelina R., 2021. "Gender differences in the relationship between perceived discrimination and personality traits in young adulthood: Evidence using sibling fixed effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    10. Becker, Gary S & Landes, Elisabeth M & Michael, Robert T, 1977. "An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(6), pages 1141-1187, December.
    11. Sawyer, P.J. & Major, B. & Casad, B.J. & Townsend, S.S.M. & Mendes, W.B., 2012. "Discrimination and the stress response: Psychological and physiological consequences of anticipating prejudice in interethnic interactions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(5), pages 1020-1026.
    12. Magali Recoules, 2011. "How can gender discrimination explain fertility behaviors and family-friendly policies?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 505-521, December.
    13. Hyunseo Rim & Jinho Kim, 2023. "Status Inconsistency, Gender, and Health in Korean Young Adults: Separating Educational and Skill Mismatch," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1141-1153, December.
    14. Jinho Kim & Taehoon Kim, 2021. "Family Formation and Dissolution During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From South Korea," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Sam Hyun Yoo & Tomáš Sobotka, 2018. "Ultra-low fertility in South Korea: The role of the tempo effect," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(22), pages 549-576.
    16. Magali Recoules, 2011. "How can gender discrimination explain fertility behaviors and family-friendly policies?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00675601, HAL.
    17. Hanna Jung & Joonmo Cho, 2020. "Gender inequality of job security: veiling glass ceiling in Korea," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 79-98, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ruiting & Xu, Gang, 2020. "Can child allowances improve fertility in a gender discrimination economy?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 162-174.
    2. Pierre‐Richard Agénor & Kamer K. Ozdemir & Emmanuel Pinto Moreira, 2021. "Gender Gaps in the Labour Market and Economic Growth," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(350), pages 235-270, April.
    3. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine & Mohun Himmelweit, Sam, 2023. "Labour market dualization, permanent insecurity and fertility: the case of ultra-low fertility in South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117935, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Rim, Hyunseo & Kim, Jinho, 2024. "The influence of perceptions of gender discrimination in the workplace on depressive symptoms among Korean working women: The moderating role of job satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Mayssun El-Attar, 2013. "Trust, child care technology choice and female labor force participation," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 507-544, December.
    6. Lucia Coppola & Mariachiara Di Cesare, 2007. "How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2007-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    7. Mizuki Komura & Hikaru Ogawa, 2022. "COVID-19, marriage, and divorce in Japan," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 831-853, September.
    8. Adam Ka-Lok Cheung & Erin Hye-Won Kim, 2022. "Domestic Outsourcing in an Ultra-Low Fertility Context: Employing Live-in Domestic Help and Fertility in Hong Kong," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1597-1618, August.
    9. Zachary Van Winkle, 2020. "Early Family Life Course Standardization in Sweden: The Role of Compositional Change," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(4), pages 765-798, September.
    10. Yen-hsin Alice Cheng, 2020. "Ultra-low fertility in East Asia: Confucianism and its discontents," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 18(1), pages 83-120.
    11. Muhammed QASIM & Muhammed Abrar ul HAQ & Tarik HUSSEIN & Charagh ROSHAN, 2018. "Does Women Well-being Matter for Demand and Development of Children?," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(29), pages 169-197, December.
    12. James M. Raymo & Hyunjoon Park, 2020. "Marriage Decline in Korea: Changing Composition of the Domestic Marriage Market and Growth in International Marriage," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(1), pages 171-194, February.
    13. Anna Matysiak & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "Family Life Courses, Uncertain Futures, and the Changing World of Work: State-of-the-Art and Prospects," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Jolene Tan & Shao-Tzu Yu, 2024. "A life course perspective: women’s childhood background and family formation trajectories in low-fertility South Korea," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Frances Goldscheider & Eva Bernhardt & Trude Lappegård, 2015. "The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 207-239, June.
    16. Lauren Hoehn-Velasco & Jose Roberto Balmori de la Miyar & Adan Silverio-Murillo & Sherajum Monira Farin, 2023. "Marriage and divorce during a pandemic: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marital formation and dissolution in Mexico," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 757-788, September.
    17. Mikko Myrskyla & Hans-Peter Kohler & Francesco C. Billari, 2011. "High development and fertility: fertility at older reproductive ages and gender equality explain the positive link," Working Papers 049, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    18. Erin Hye-Won Kim & Adam Ka-Lok Cheung, 2019. "The Gendered Division of Household Labor over Parenthood Transitions: A Longitudinal Study in South Korea," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(4), pages 459-482, August.
    19. Chen Luo & Ewa Jarosz, 2025. "Job creation, job destruction, and fertility in Germany," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 52(13), pages 383-414.
    20. Luca Maria Pesando & GFC team, 2019. "Global Family Change: Persistent Diversity with Development," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 133-168, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09965-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.