IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/netspa/v6y2006i2p97-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Alternative Model Structures and Criteria for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Miranda-Moreno

    ()

  • Liping Fu

    ()

Abstract

In transportation safety literature, many statistical models and criteria have been proposed for quantifying risk at transportation facilities such as roadway intersections and highway–rail grade crossings, and identifying candidate locations, or blackspots, for engineering improvements. There are, however, few systematic studies on the comparative performance and practical implications of these models and criteria. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the relative impacts that the use of various alternative models and ranking criteria can have on identifying blackspots. Three alternative models are considered in this investigation, including the popular negative binomial model (NB), the heterogeneous negative binomial model (HNB), and the zero inflated negative binomial model (ZINB). The expected accident frequency based on both marginal distribution and posterior distribution is considered as a ranking criterion. A sample of highway–railway grade crossings located in the Canadian railway network is used in this investigation as an application environment. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Miranda-Moreno & Liping Fu, 2006. "A Comparative Study of Alternative Model Structures and Criteria for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvements," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 97-110, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:97-110
    DOI: 10.1007/s11067-006-7695-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11067-006-7695-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Hossein Anisi & Abdul Hanan Abdullah, 2016. "Efficient Data Reporting in Intelligent Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 623-642, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:97-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.