Author
Listed:
- Liu Ruichao
(Qingdao University, School of Economics)
- Wu Buran
(Qingdao University, School of Economics)
Abstract
Common prosperity is a pivotal component of China's modernization strategy, yet a uniform quantitative standard for this concept has not been established. The development of a practical and quantifiable index is crucial for advancing the goal of common prosperity. This study employs panel data from 309 prefecture-level cities and above, covering the years 2014 to 2020, to explore the dynamics of common prosperity at the urban level. By employing an equal-weight common prosperity function, the research extends measurement techniques and incorporates a range of methods to analyze the distribution dynamics, interval differences, structural disparities, and convergence characteristics of common prosperity. The results show that common prosperity levels in urban areas have consistently increased, with particularly notable growth rates in the western region. Despite this progress, the spatial distribution maintains a stepped structure from east to west. The common prosperity index displays a more dispersed spatial pattern, with a pronounced northeast-southwest orientation. The study also identifies significant positive agglomeration effects, characterized by high-high and low-low clustering, accompanied by spatial spillover. There is evidence of significant convergence in the levels of common prosperity, indicating a narrowing gap between cities. Further analysis indicates that most cities tend to inhibit the convergence of common prosperity, and disparities between the three major regions and provinces remain key factors influencing the overall level of common prosperity. These findings underscore the complexity of achieving common prosperity and highlight the need for targeted regional policies to address these disparities effectively.
Suggested Citation
Liu Ruichao & Wu Buran, 2025.
"Bridging the Gap: Unveiling the Spatial Dynamics and Convergence of Common Prosperity in China's Urbans,"
Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1063-1096, December.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:netspa:v:25:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11067-025-09690-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-025-09690-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:25:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11067-025-09690-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.