Author
Listed:
- Zenaye Degefu Agazhi
(Department of Economics)
- Melkamu Mada
(Department of Economics)
- Mebratu Alemu
(Department of Economics)
Abstract
Ethiopia has been advocating cluster farming as an approach to improve productivity and accomplish the SDGs of poverty eradication and ending hunger, yet there are insufficient studies on the impact of cluster farming on wheat farmers’ efficiency. This research aims to fill this gap using a sample of 422 wheat farmers within the Arsi zone of Ethiopia. In this study, the efficiency of wheat farmers was assessed using the parametric Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier model, and it suggests that they are performing below the maximum efficiency level. To capture the impact of cluster farming on efficiency of wheat farmers, the two-stage endogenous switching regression model was estimated. In the 1st stage, the probit model was estimated, and the result confirms the positive correlation between cluster farming participation and age, land size, and education level among farmers. Conversely, increased distance from the main market, farmers’ cooperative, and road infrastructure was negatively associated with cluster farming participation. The impact assessment model result indicates that participation in cluster farming yields substantial gains in the technical efficiency of wheat farmers (15.08% for participants; 15.37% for non-participants) alongside notable enhancements in allocative (5.14%) and economic (8.11%) efficiency. The findings herein provide a compelling rationale for prioritizing policies and strategies that encourage cluster farming as a means of enhancing wheat farmer efficiency. This requires a concerted effort to support farmer education programs, improve access to market outlets and road networks, and enhance the provision and effectiveness of farmers’ cooperatives.
Suggested Citation
Zenaye Degefu Agazhi & Melkamu Mada & Mebratu Alemu, 2025.
"Does cluster farming improve efficiency? A case of wheat farmers in Arsi Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia,"
Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 133-144, October.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:jproda:v:64:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11123-025-00766-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-025-00766-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jproda:v:64:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11123-025-00766-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.