IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jfamec/v46y2025i2d10.1007_s10834-024-10021-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caregiver Perceptions and Experiences of the Child Tax Credit Expansion: Evidence from Maryland

Author

Listed:
  • C. Ross Hatton

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Janny Dinh

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Adrija Chakrabarty

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Shannon Frattaroli

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Adam S. Levine

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
    SNF Agora Institute of Johns Hopkins University)

  • Keshia M. Pollack Porter

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Erin R. Hager

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Abstract

The child tax credit expansion of 2021 heralded a substantial, albeit temporary, expansion of the social safety net. Despite the breadth of evidence regarding the credit’s effects on population health, there has been little attention to how families experienced and understood it. This study uses semi-structured interviews conducted between March and June 2023 with 22 caregivers living in Maryland that received the credit to fill gaps about how caregivers experienced the expansion and how their understanding of the expansion shaped these experiences. Caregivers, regardless of income, reported that the expanded child tax credit payments provided financial stability in otherwise uncertain times. However, many were confused by the credit’s structure and concerned about its financial implications for their 2022 tax returns, which contributed to financial anxiety and reinforced feelings of mistrust towards the government, particularly among lower- and middle-income caregivers. Although the expanded child tax credit was broadly beneficial, policymakers enacting similar policies in the future should consider distributing funds outside of the federal tax system, which may be confusing for recipients and may contributed to unintended consequences such as financial anxiety.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Ross Hatton & Janny Dinh & Adrija Chakrabarty & Shannon Frattaroli & Adam S. Levine & Keshia M. Pollack Porter & Erin R. Hager, 2025. "Caregiver Perceptions and Experiences of the Child Tax Credit Expansion: Evidence from Maryland," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 586-597, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:46:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10834-024-10021-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10834-024-10021-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10834-024-10021-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10834-024-10021-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy M. Smeeding & Katherin Ross Phillips & Michael O'Connor, 2000. "The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use and Economic and Social Mobility," JCPR Working Papers 139, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    2. Naomi E. Feldman & Peter Katuš?ák & Laura Kawano, 2016. "Taxpayer Confusion: Evidence from the Child Tax Credit," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(3), pages 807-835, March.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:rnmfv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Romich, Jennifer L. & Weisner, Thomas, 2000. "How Families View and Use the EITC: Advance Payment Versus Lump Sum Delivery," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(4), pages 1245-1266, December.
    5. Collyer, Sophie & Gandhi, Jill & Garfinkel, Irwin & Ross, Schuyler & Waldfogel, Jane & Wimer, Christopher, 2022. "The Effects of the 2021 Monthly Child Tax Credit on Child and Family Well-being: Evidence from New York City," SocArXiv rnmfv, Center for Open Science.
    6. Zachary Parolin & Sophie Collyer & Megan Curran & Christoper Wimer, 2021. "Monthly Poverty Rates among Children after the Expansion of the Child Tax Credit," Poverty and Social Policy Brief 20412, Center on Poverty and Social Policy, Columbia University.
    7. Smeeding, Timothy M. & Phillips, Katherin Ross & O’Connor, Michael, 2000. "The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use, and Economic and Social Mobility," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 1187-210, December.
    8. Jennifer L. Romich & Thomas Weisner, 2000. "How Families View and Use the EITC: Advanced Payment versus Lump-sum Delivery," JCPR Working Papers 138, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    9. Romich, Jennifer L. & Weisner, Thomas, 2000. "How Families View and Use the EITC: Advance Payment versus Lump Sum Delivery," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 1245-66, December.
    10. Elizabeth Lyon & J. R. Catlin, 2020. "Consumer Misconceptions about Tax Laws: Results from a Survey in the United States," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 807-828, December.
    11. Smeeding, Timothy M. & Phillips, Katherin Ross & O’Connor, Michael, 2000. "The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use, and Economic and Social Mobility," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(4), pages 1187-1210, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Simpson & Devin Reilly & Kartik Athreya, 2010. "The Earned Income Tax Credit: Insurance Without Disincentives?," 2010 Meeting Papers 1103, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Kleven, Henrik, 2024. "The EITC and the extensive margin: A reappraisal," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Katie Fitzpatrick, 2015. "Does “Banking the Unbanked” Help Families to Save? Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 223-249, March.
    4. Karen Z. Kramer & Flávia Cristina Drumond Andrade & Andrew J. Greenlee & Ruby Mendenhall & Dylan Bellisle & Renee Lemons Blanks, 2019. "Periodic Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) Payment, Financial Stress and Wellbeing: A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 511-523, September.
    5. Nada Eissa & Hilary W. Hoynes, 2006. "Behavioral Responses to Taxes: Lessons from the EITC and Labor Supply," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 20, pages 73-110, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Aida Farmand & Owen Davis, 2021. "Who Does the Earned Income Tax Credit Benefit? A Monopsony View," SCEPA working paper series. 2021-02, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    7. Hatton, C.Ross & Levine, Adam S. & Pollack Porter, Keshia M. & Hager, Erin R., 2025. "More money, more questions: How caregivers spent the expanded child tax credit," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Nada Eissa & Hilary W. Hoynes, 2006. "Behavioral Responses to Taxes: Lessons from the EITC and Labor Supply," NBER Chapters,in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 20, pages 73-110 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Jonathan Fisher & Bradley L. Hardy, 2023. "Money matters: consumption variability across the income distribution," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 275-298, September.
    10. Nicole Simpson & Jill Tiefenthaler & Jameson Hyde, 2010. "The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(6), pages 843-864, December.
    11. Jonathan Fisher & David H. Rehkopf, 2022. "The Earned Income Tax Credit as supplementary food benefits and savings for durable goods," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(3), pages 439-455, July.
    12. Dayanand S. Manoli & Nicholas Turner, 2014. "Nudges and Learning: Evidence from Informational Interventions for Low-Income Taxpayers," NBER Working Papers 20718, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. H. Shaefer & Xiaoqing Song & Trina Williams Shanks, 2013. "Do single mothers in the United States use the Earned Income Tax Credit to reduce unsecured debt?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 659-680, December.
    14. Alex Rees-Jones & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2020. "Measuring “Schmeduling”," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(5), pages 2399-2438.
    15. Sydnee Caldwell & Scott Nelson & Daniel Waldinger, 2023. "Tax Refund Uncertainty: Evidence and Welfare Implications," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 352-376, April.
    16. Elizabeth Lyon & J. R. Catlin, 2020. "Consumer Misconceptions about Tax Laws: Results from a Survey in the United States," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 807-828, December.
    17. Jeehoon Han & Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2022. "Real-Time Poverty, Material Well-Being, and the Child Tax Credit," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 817-846.
    18. Emma Tominey, 2010. "The Timing of Parental Income and Child Outcomes: The Role of Permanent and Transitory Shocks," CEE Discussion Papers 0120, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
    19. Congdon, William J. & Kling, Jeffrey R. & Mullainathan, Sendhil, 2009. "Behavioral Economics and Tax Policy," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 62(3), pages 375-386, September.
    20. Manturuk, Kim & Dorrance, Jessica & Riley, Sarah, 2012. "Factors affecting completion of a matched savings program: Impacts of time preference, discount rate, and financial hardship," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 836-842.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:46:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10834-024-10021-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.