IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ijhcfe/v4y2004i2p159-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five Reasons Why Health Care Quality Research Hasn't Affected Competition Law and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Hyman

    ()

Abstract

Research on health care quality has become increasingly sophisticated, but the research has not had a major impact on competition law and policy. Five specific translational barriers (relevance/litigation dynamics, complexity, framing, judicial and administrative skepticism, and inadequate demand) are identified. If researchers on health care quality want to have an impact on competition law and policy they must confront and overcome these translational barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Hyman, 2004. "Five Reasons Why Health Care Quality Research Hasn't Affected Competition Law and Policy," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 159-166, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:4:y:2004:i:2:p:159-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/1389-6563/contents
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björn Wikström & Michael Fored & Margaret Eichleay & Stefan Jacobson, 2007. "The financing and organization of medical care for patients with end-stage renal disease in Sweden," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 269-281, December.
    2. Toni Ashton & Mark Marshall, 2007. "The organization and financing of dialysis and kidney transplantation services in New Zealand," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 233-252, December.
    3. José Luño, 2007. "The organization and financing of end-stage renal disease in Spain," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, pages 253-267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:4:y:2004:i:2:p:159-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.