Author
Listed:
- Wenshuai Qin
(Bukhara State University, Faculty of Economics and Tourism)
- Chien-ping Chen
(Texas A&M University-Victoria, College of Business)
- Yangyang Wang
(Shandong Technology and Business University, School of Public Administration)
- Hong Chen
(Anhui University of Finance and Economics, School of Languages and Media)
- Ze Zhang
(Southern Connecticut State University, School of Business)
- Lijian Qin
(Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Research Center for Health Economics)
Abstract
This study analyzes nationwide micro-survey data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey 2018 to assess the impact of home care and medical insurance on the health of older people in China, using factors that influence healthcare utilization. Applying the Andersen model, the findings reveal: (1) Home care and medical service use are complementary, increasing inpatient service utilization and total medical costs. (2) The effect varies by insurance type. Under the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme, home care raises inpatient service use and costs. Under Urban Employee/Resident Medical Insurance, home care has no statistically significant impact. Under Public Medical Care for Civil Servants, home care reduces inpatient service use, suggesting substitution. (3) Age-related patterns differ across programs, with the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme showing declining utilization, the Urban Employee/Resident Medical Insurance exhibiting a diminishing increase, and the Public Medical Care for Civil Servants indicating potential overuse. The Chinese government should consider restructuring its national medical insurance programs and promoting the substitutive effect of home care to enhance the well-being and social security of the aging population.
Suggested Citation
Wenshuai Qin & Chien-ping Chen & Yangyang Wang & Hong Chen & Ze Zhang & Lijian Qin, 2025.
"Effects of Home Care on the Use of Medical Services by the Elderly in China’s National Medical Insurance System,"
International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 31(4), pages 217-232, November.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:31:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11294-025-09937-1
DOI: 10.1007/s11294-025-09937-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:31:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11294-025-09937-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.