IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/fmktpm/v39y2025i3d10.1007_s11408-025-00470-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry classification, industry concentration, and stock returns

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Li

    (California State University–Los Angeles)

  • James Refalo

    (California State University–Los Angeles)

  • Jong-Hwan Yi

    (California State University–Los Angeles)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between industry concentration level and stock returns under different levels of industry classification in the USA. We find that the effect varies significantly across different levels of industry classification. Such variation cannot be fully explained by common risk factors such as size, book-to-market ratio, and momentum. The relationship also varies by different sample periods that characterize market microstructure evolution from 1963 to 2019. Two-digit SICCD and Fama French 48 industry classification appear to generate much higher returns from industry concentration level high-minus-low portfolios during the industry consolidation era (1998–2019). The results support both Schumpeter’s theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Li & James Refalo & Jong-Hwan Yi, 2025. "Industry classification, industry concentration, and stock returns," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 39(3), pages 337-363, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:fmktpm:v:39:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11408-025-00470-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11408-025-00470-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11408-025-00470-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11408-025-00470-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kahle, Kathleen M. & Walkling, Ralph A., 1996. "The Impact of Industry Classifications on Financial Research," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 309-335, September.
    2. David R. Gallagher & Katja Ignatieva & James McCulloch & Henk Berkman, 2015. "Industry concentration, excess returns and innovation in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 443-466, June.
    3. Tobias J. Moskowitz & Mark Grinblatt, 1999. "Do Industries Explain Momentum?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1249-1290, August.
    4. Li, Scott & Liu, Qianqiu & Refalo, James, 2020. "Industry classification, product market competition, and firm characteristics," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    5. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2016. "Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1423-1465.
    6. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728.
    7. Ashiq Ali & Sandy Klasa & Eric Yeung, 2009. "The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(10), pages 3839-3871, October.
    8. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(1), pages 65-91, March.
    9. Hrazdil, Karel & Trottier, Kim & Zhang, Ray, 2013. "A comparison of industry classification schemes: A large sample study," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 77-80.
    10. Marti G. Subrahmanyam & Stavros B. Thomadakis, 1980. "Systematic Risk and the Theory of the Firm," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 94(3), pages 437-451.
    11. Karel Hrazdil & Thomas Scott, 2013. "The role of industry classification in estimating discretionary accruals," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 15-39, January.
    12. Gustavo Grullon & Yelena Larkin & Roni Michaely, 2019. "Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 697-743.
    13. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2010. "Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(10), pages 3773-3811, October.
    14. Karel Hrazdil & Kim Trottier & Ray Zhang, 2014. "An intra- and inter-industry evaluation of three classification schemes common in capital market research," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(17), pages 2021-2033, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Scott, 2022. "Industry classification, industry momentum and short-term reversal," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    2. Li, Scott & Liu, Qianqiu & Refalo, James, 2020. "Industry classification, product market competition, and firm characteristics," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Dou, Winston Wei & Ji, Yan & Wu, Wei, 2021. "Competition, profitability, and discount rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 582-620.
    4. Amini, Shahram & Kumar, Raman & Shome, Dilip, 2024. "Product market competition and corporate investment: An empirical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Li, Dongxu, 2024. "Horizontal mergers and heterogeneous firm investments: evidence from the United States," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Le, Danh Vinh & Le, Huong Thi Thu & Vo, Lai Van, 2021. "The bright side of product market threats: The case of innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 161-176.
    7. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2017. "Open Source Fundamental Industry Classification," Papers 1706.04210, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    8. Fathollahi, Maryam & Harford, Jarrad & Klasa, Sandy, 2022. "Anticompetitive effects of horizontal acquisitions: The impact of within-industry product similarity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 645-669.
    9. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2017. "Open Source Fundamental Industry Classification," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-77, June.
    10. Scott Li, 2021. "Product market competition and intermediate-term momentum," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 35(2), pages 255-267, June.
    11. Avramov, D. & Ge, S. & Li, S. & Linton, O. B., 2025. "Dual Industry Effects and Cross-Stock Predictability," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2506, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Hussein Abdoh & Yu Liu, 2021. "Executive risk incentives, product market competition, and R&D," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 133-156, February.
    13. Chris Florackis & Christodoulos Louca & Roni Michaely & Michael Weber, 2023. "Cybersecurity Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 351-407.
    14. Schlag, Christian & Zeng, Kailin, 2019. "Horizontal industry relationships and return predictability," SAFE Working Paper Series 256, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    15. Wang, Z., 2025. "Patent Pledge and Technological Innovation: The "Good Faith" of Tesla," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2532, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Kim, Yongjin & Kuehn, Lars-Alexander & Li, Kai, 2024. "Learning about the consumption risk exposure of firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. D’Acunto, Francesco & Liu, Ryan & Pflueger, Carolin & Weber, Michael, 2018. "Flexible prices and leverage," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 46-68.
    18. Yasser Alhenawi & Martha L. Stilwell, 2019. "Toward a complete definition of relatedness in merger and acquisition transactions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 351-396, August.
    19. Durnev, Art & Mangen, Claudine, 2020. "The spillover effects of MD&A disclosures for real investment: The role of industry competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    20. de Bodt, Eric & Cousin, Jean-Gabriel & Officer, Micah S. & Roll, Richard, 2024. "The deterrence effect of M&A regulatory enforcements," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:fmktpm:v:39:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11408-025-00470-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.