IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v88y2025i7d10.1007_s10640-025-00998-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Quantitative Macroeconomic and Ecosystem Service Modeling Methods to Assess Conservation Programs in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Onil Banerjee

    (RMGEO Consultants Inc.)

  • Martín Cicowiez

    (National University of La Plata)

  • Juan Manuel Torres-Rojo

    (Iberoamerican University, University Transdisciplinary Center for Sustainability)

  • Kenneth J. Bagstad

    (Geosciences and Environmental Change Science, Center United States Geological Survey)

  • Renato Vargas

    (CHW Research)

  • Bram Edens

    (OECD Statistics and Data Directorate)

  • Jacob Salcone

    (United Nations Environment Program, The Economics of Nature Unit, Ecosystems Division)

  • Elsa Marcela Begne de Larrea

    (United Nations Statistics Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs)

  • Mónica Lopez-Conlon

    (United Nations Environment Program, The Economics of Nature Unit, Ecosystems Division)

  • César Rodríguez-Ortega

    (Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources)

  • José Eduardo de la Torre-Bárcena

    (National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI-Mexico))

  • Vicente Díaz-Núñez

    (National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI-Mexico))

  • Francisco Guillen-Martin

    (National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI-Mexico))

Abstract

Conveying the importance of public conservation programs to Government decision makers is challenging given the long-term nature of investments in conservation and competition for scarce public resources. The effectiveness of conservation programs in terms of their impact on ecological and socioeconomic outcomes has been evaluated in the literature though not typically in an integrated way that enables the assessment of trade-offs across environmental, economic and social objectives. Through a novel approach that uses macroeconomic tools that incorporate land use-land cover change and ecosystem services, we conduct policy scenario analysis to investigate the economic, natural capital and ecosystem service impacts of three conservation programs in Mexico. We show their combined impact on Gross Domestic Product and wealth in 2035 to be US$856.9 and US$492.3 million, respectively and that the programs reduce poverty by 1,800 individuals. In addition to macroeconomic effects, our approach illustrates that by accounting for changes in regulating ecosystem service flows, cumulative Gross Domestic Product would be 1.34 times higher. Our results build a business case for ongoing investment and expansion of these conservation programs by demonstrating the benefits to biodiversity, natural capital and the economic well-being of Mexican society. The case study allows for replication in other countries as the tools and data employed are openly available for much of Latin America and the Caribbean, Southeast Asia and increasingly worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Onil Banerjee & Martín Cicowiez & Juan Manuel Torres-Rojo & Kenneth J. Bagstad & Renato Vargas & Bram Edens & Jacob Salcone & Elsa Marcela Begne de Larrea & Mónica Lopez-Conlon & César Rodríguez-Orteg, 2025. "Integrating Quantitative Macroeconomic and Ecosystem Service Modeling Methods to Assess Conservation Programs in Mexico," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(7), pages 1995-2021, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10640-025-00998-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10640-025-00998-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-025-00998-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10640-025-00998-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10640-025-00998-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.