IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v21y2003i1p87-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Models of Information Costs Based on Computational Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Eboli

Abstract

This work examines then computational cost of processing the information required by Bayesian updating of beliefs. The standard statistical approach adopted by economists, restricted to the exponential family, ignores thesecomputational aspects. To fill this lacuna, two models of probabilisticreasoning are put forward: a model of associative memory and a well established tool of Artificial Intelligence called `Bayesian Networks'. These models are used to evaluate the time complexity and hence the computational cost. The associativememory model shows processing cost to be proportional to the entropy of the signal. This result is applied to classes of informationally equivalentsignals to characterise the least expensive signals within the class. TheBayesian Network Model comprises a graphical representation of the causaland/or probabilistic relations among the random variables that generate thesignal. According to this model, the computational cost depends on the sizeand connectivity of the graphical structure. The belief that the cost ofinference is monotonically increasing in its precision is shown incorrect. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Eboli, 2003. "Two Models of Information Costs Based on Computational Complexity," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 87-105, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:21:y:2003:i:1:p:87-105
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1022291016063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1022291016063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1022291016063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:21:y:2003:i:1:p:87-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.