IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v14y1999i3p197-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multicriteria Decision Aid Methodology for Sorting Decision Problems: The Case of Financial Distress

Author

Listed:
  • Zopounidis, Constantin
  • Doumpos, Michael

Abstract

Sorting problems constitute a major part of real world decisions, where a set of alternative actions (solutions) must be classified into two or more predefined classes. Multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) provides several methodologies, which are well adapted in sorting problems. A well known approach in MCDA is based on preference disaggregation which has already been used in ranking problems, but it is also applicable in sorting problems. The UTADIS (UTilities Additives DIScriminantes) method, a variant of the UTA method, based on the preference disaggregation approach estimates a set of additive utility functions and utility profiles using linear programming techniques in order to minimize the misclassification error between the predefined classes in sorting problems. This paper presents the application of the UTADIS method in two real world classification problems concerning the field of financial distress. The applications are derived by the studies of Slowinski and Zopounidis (1995), and Dimitras et al. (1999). The obtained results depict the superiority of the UTADIS method over discriminant analysis, and they are also comparable with the results derived by other multicriteria methods. Citation Copyright 1999 by Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 1999. "A Multicriteria Decision Aid Methodology for Sorting Decision Problems: The Case of Financial Distress," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 14(3), pages 197-218, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:14:y:1999:i:3:p:197-218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0927-7099/contents
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:14:y:1999:i:3:p:197-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.