IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v19y2021i4d10.1007_s10308-021-00620-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Saami and the Karen — common experience and differences: a comparative perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Szpak

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University)

  • Maria Ochwat

    (University of Szczecin)

Abstract

This paper offers a comparative perspective on a specific issue of the indigenous peoples of the Saami and the Karen. The groups being compared are from Europe and Asia, selected on the basis of their particular circumstances of living in more than one State. However, while the Saami are a relatively well-treated people that enjoy a form of cultural autonomy; the Karen are in a far worse situation with regard to their legal position as well as actual living conditions. The authors examine the cultural, political, and legal aspects of the Saami and the Karen situations and compare their common experience and aspirations. The article attempts to answer the question as to what the similarities and differences between the two indigenous peoples are and what lessons can be learned by those peoples that may be helpful in realizing their aspirations.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Szpak & Maria Ochwat, 2021. "The Saami and the Karen — common experience and differences: a comparative perspective," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 445-465, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:19:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10308-021-00620-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00620-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-021-00620-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-021-00620-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:19:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10308-021-00620-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.