IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jss/jstsof/v034i08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fortran 90 Program for Confirmatory Analysis of Variance

Author

Listed:
  • Kuiper, Rebecca M.
  • Klugkist, Irene
  • Hoijtink, Herbert

Abstract

There are different confirmatory techniques to compare means, like hypothesis testing and (Bayesian) model selection. However, there is no software package in which these techniques are available. A Fortran 90 program is written, which enables researchers to apply these techniques to their data. Besides traditional hypotheses, like H0 : µ1 = µ2 = µ3 and Hu : µ1, µ2, µ3, order-restricted hypotheses, like µ1 > µ2 > µ3 or µ1 > µ2 = µ3 or µ1 > µ2

Suggested Citation

  • Kuiper, Rebecca M. & Klugkist, Irene & Hoijtink, Herbert, 2010. "A Fortran 90 Program for Confirmatory Analysis of Variance," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 34(i08).
    • Handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:034:i08
    DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v034.i08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/view/v034i08/v34i08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v034i08/ConfirmatoryANOVA-sources.zip
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v034i08/ConfirmatoryANOVA-binaries.zip
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v034i08/v34i08-example.zip
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v034.i08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klugkist, Irene & Hoijtink, Herbert, 2007. "The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6367-6379, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andr'es Ram'irez-Hassan & Alejandro L'opez-Vera, 2021. "Semi-parametric estimation of the EASI model: Welfare implications of taxes identifying clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity," Papers 2109.07646, arXiv.org.
    2. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian comparison of models with inequality and equality constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-182.
    3. Bartolucci, Francesco & Scaccia, Luisa & Farcomeni, Alessio, 2012. "Bayesian inference through encompassing priors and importance sampling for a class of marginal models for categorical data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4067-4080.
    4. Jean-Paul Fox & Joris Mulder & Sandip Sinharay, 2017. "Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 979-1006, December.
    5. Joris Mulder & James O. Berger & Víctor Peña & M. J. Bayarri, 2021. "On the prevalence of information inconsistency in normal linear models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 103-132, March.
    6. Muye Chen & Michel Regenwetter & Clintin P. Davis-Stober, 2021. "Collective Choice May Tell Nothing About Anyone’s Individual Preferences," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Guido Consonni & Roberta Paroli, 2017. "Objective Bayesian Comparison of Constrained Analysis of Variance Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 589-609, September.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:46:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Mulder, Joris, 2014. "Prior adjusted default Bayes factors for testing (in)equality constrained hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 448-463.
    11. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2017. "Exact One-Sided Bayes Factors for 2 by 2 Contingency Tables," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(3), pages 465-472, October.
    12. Wetzels, Ruud & Grasman, Raoul P.P.P. & Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, 2010. "An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2094-2102, September.
    13. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian test on equality of score parameters in the order restricted RC association model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 147-157.
    14. Roberta Paroli & Guido Consonni, 2020. "Objective Bayesian comparison of order-constrained models in contingency tables," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 139-165, March.
    15. Herbert Hoijtink, 2013. "Objective Bayes Factors for Inequality Constrained Hypotheses," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 207-229, August.
    16. Heck, Daniel W. & Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan & Morey, Richard D., 2015. "Testing order constraints: Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 157-162.
    17. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2022. "Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1214-1237, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:034:i08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jstatsoft.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.