IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jss/jstsof/v031i03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R

Author

Listed:
  • de Leeuw, Jan
  • Mair, Patrick

Abstract

In this paper we present the methodology of multidimensional scaling problems (MDS) solved by means of the majorization algorithm. The objective function to be minimized is known as stress and functions which majorize stress are elaborated. This strategy to solve MDS problems is called SMACOF and it is implemented in an R package of the same name which is presented in this article. We extend the basic SMACOF theory in terms of configuration constraints, three-way data, unfolding models, and projection of the resulting configurations onto spheres and other quadratic surfaces. Various examples are presented to show the possibilities of the SMACOF approach offered by the corresponding package.

Suggested Citation

  • de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
  • Handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:031:i03
    DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v031.i03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/view/v031i03/v31i03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v031i03/smacof_1.0-0.tar.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v031i03/v31i03.R.zip
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v031i03/v31i03-erratum.R
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v031i03/ciexyz31_1.txt
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v031.i03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    2. Roger Shepard, 1974. "Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 373-421, December.
    3. Patrick Groenen & Willem Heiser, 1996. "The tunneling method for global optimization in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 529-550, September.
    4. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    5. Ingwer Borg & James Lingoes, 1980. "A model and algorithm for multidimensional scaling with external constraints on the distances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 25-38, March.
    6. Jan Leeuw & Jacqueline Meulman, 1986. "A special Jackknife for Multidimensional Scaling," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 3(1), pages 97-112, March.
    7. Peter Schönemann, 1972. "An algebraic solution for a class of subjective metrics models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 441-451, December.
    8. Jacqueline Meulman, 1992. "The integration of multidimensional scaling and multivariate analysis with optimal transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 539-565, December.
    9. Jan Leeuw, 1988. "Convergence of the majorization method for multidimensional scaling," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 163-180, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yunxiao & Ying, Zhiliang & Zhang, Haoran, 2021. "Unfolding-model-based visualization: theory, method and applications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108876, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Evans, Gary, 2014. "Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 58(b01).
    3. Štajdohar, Miha & Demšar, Janez, 2013. "Interactive Network Exploration with Orange," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 53(i06).
    4. Luis M. Arciniega & Laura J. Stanley & Diana Puga-Méndez & Dalia Obregón-Schael & Isaac Politi-Salame, 2019. "The Relationship Between Individual Work Values and Unethical Decision-Making and Behavior at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1133-1148, September.
    5. Köhn, Hans-Friedrich, 2010. "Representation of individual differences in rectangular proximity data through anti-Q matrix decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 2343-2357, October.
    6. Si-Tong Lu & Miao Zhang & Qing-Na Li, 2020. "Feasibility and a fast algorithm for Euclidean distance matrix optimization with ordinal constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 535-569, June.
    7. Michael J. Greenacre & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2016. "Weighted Euclidean Biplots," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(3), pages 442-459, October.
    8. Tom Everaert & Adriaan Spruyt & Jan De Houwer, 2018. "To IMPRES or to EXPRES? Exploiting comparative judgments to measure and visualize implicit and explicit preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Marek Walesiak & Andrzej Dudek, 2017. "Selecting The Optimal Multidimensional Scaling Procedure For Metric Data With R Environment," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(3), pages 521-540, September.
    10. Gruenhage, Gina & Opper, Manfred & Barthelme, Simon, 2016. "Visualizing the effects of a changing distance on data using continuous embeddings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 51-65.
    11. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Chien, Ya-Ling & Nguyen, Ngoc-Mai & Truong, Dinh-Nhat, 2018. "Pricing policy of floating ticket fare for riding high speed rail based on time-space compression," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 179-192.
    12. Funk, Patrick & Davis, Alex & Vaishnav, Parth & Dewitt, Barry & Fuchs, Erica, 2020. "Individual inconsistency and aggregate rationality: Overcoming inconsistencies in expert judgment at the technical frontier," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Theuβl, Stefan & Reutterer, Thomas & Hornik, Kurt, 2014. "How to derive consensus among various marketing journal rankings?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 998-1006.
    14. McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "And then the internet happened: Thoughts on the future of concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 293-300.
    15. Silvia Salini & Matteo Turri, 2016. "How to measure institutional diversity in higher education using revenue data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1165-1183, May.
    16. JA Tenreiro Machado & Maria Eugénia Mata, 2015. "Analysis of World Economic Variables Using Multidimensional Scaling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    2. Richard Sands & Forrest Young, 1980. "Component models for three-way data: An alternating least squares algorithm with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 39-67, March.
    3. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    4. Groenen, P.J.F. & Borg, I., 2013. "The Past, Present, and Future of Multidimensional Scaling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2013-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    5. S. Hess & E. Suárez & J. Camacho & G. Ramírez & B. Hernández, 2001. "Reliability of Coordinates Obtained by MINISSA Concerning the Order of Presented Stimuli," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 117-128, May.
    6. Rolf Langeheine, 1982. "Statistical evaluation of measures of fit in the Lingoes-Borg procrustean individual differences scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 427-442, December.
    7. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    8. Michael C Hout & Stephen D Goldinger & Kyle J Brady, 2014. "MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Jan Leeuw & Sandra Pruzansky, 1978. "A new computational method to fit the weighted euclidean distance model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 479-490, December.
    10. J. Carroll, 1976. "Spatial, non-spatial and hybrid models for scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 439-463, December.
    11. Phipps Arabie, 1991. "Was euclid an unnecessarily sophisticated psychologist?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 567-587, December.
    12. James Lingoes & Ingwer Borg, 1978. "A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 491-519, December.
    13. Malone, Samuel W. & Tarazaga, Pablo & Trosset, Michael W., 2002. "Better initial configurations for metric multidimensional scaling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 143-156, November.
    14. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1980. "An individual differences additive model: An alterating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 183-209, June.
    15. Leung, Pui Lam & Lau, Kin-nam, 2004. "Estimating the city-block two-dimensional scaling model with simulated annealing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 518-524, October.
    16. Christopher Hare & Keith T. Poole, 2015. "Measuring ideology in Congress," Chapters, in: Jac C. Heckelman & Nicholas R. Miller (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Voting, chapter 18, pages 327-346, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Bolton, Patrick & Li, Tao & Ravina, Enrichetta & Rosenthal, Howard, 2020. "Investor ideology," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 320-352.
    18. Robert MacCallum, 1977. "Effects of conditionality on INDSCAL and ALSCAL weights," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 297-305, June.
    19. Adri Smaling & Geert Soete, 1992. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 451-457, September.
    20. Husson, F. & Pages, J., 2006. "INDSCAL model: geometrical interpretation and methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 358-378, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:031:i03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.jstatsoft.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jstatsoft.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.