Weighting by what should do, and the effect of that on controlling contemporary fatwas

The research dealt with the study of the truth of the term of what must be weighted by work to advance the contradiction between the seemingly contradictory evidence and contradictory jurisprudence, and its effect on controlling contemporary fatwas. The research focused on explaining the concept of weighting with what the work includes, which is to present the mujtahid, one of the two contradictory guides that contradict what most companions, followers, or divine scholars of the nation have done with it, and that taking into account what is required of work and weighting with it is a methodology that most of the companion’s scholars - may God be pleased with them - followed The followers and the leading scholars. It also focused on showing the fact of controlling the fatwa by taking into account what is required of it and the weighting of it, as it lies in the discipline of the collective fatwa issued by the jurisprudential councils and advisory bodies, as this fatwa issued by them will be the one that has to work in the contemporary reality, so it will prevail over others and be pronounced, and as for discipline The individual fatwa, the mufti must control the fatwa issued by him taking into account what is the work and weighting it, and the weighting of what he has to work has an impact on the discipline of the fatwas in the original and contemporary issues and this is achieved by weighting the evidence or the saying that work on others.