IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejss/v6y2017i2sp55-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving students van Hiele and proof-writing ability using Geometer’s sketchpad

Author

Listed:
  • Wenceslao A. Coronado

    (Mindanao State University, Naawan, Misamis Oriental, Philippines)

  • Charita A. Luna
  • Dennis A. Tarepe

    (Mindanao University of Science and Technology, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines)

Abstract

This paper was undertaken to determine the Philippine Science High School-Central Mindanao Campus sophomore science students van Hiele levels of understanding and proof-writing ability as influenced by Geometers Sketchpad. The place of the study was conducted at Philippine Science High School Central Mindanao Campus, Baloi, Lanao del Norte during the third and fourth quarter period of the school year, 2010. The subjects were second year high school students comprising of three intact sections with a total population of forty-four (44). The research employed the one-shot pretest and posttest design. The van Hiele geometry test and sets of proof-writing problems were administered, before using the Geometer’s Sketchpad software. The same test instruments were administered after the treatment and the posttest score were considered as criterion measure. The frequency distribution of students van Hiele levels of understanding before and after using the Geometers Sketchpad revealed that majority of the students improved their knowledge in the subject from abstract level of thinking to deductive level thinking. The t-test of independence showed the following results: (1) There is significant difference between pretest and posttest on the student’s van Hiele levels of understanding as influence by Geometer’s Sketchpad; (2) There is significant difference between pretest and posttest on the student’s proof-writing test as influence by Geometer’s Sketchpad.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenceslao A. Coronado & Charita A. Luna & Dennis A. Tarepe, 2017. "Improving students van Hiele and proof-writing ability using Geometer’s sketchpad," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 6(2Special), pages 55-74, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:6:y:2017:i:2s:p:55-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol6/No2S/JSSarticle7,6_2_Specialpp55-74.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:6:y:2017:i:2s:p:55-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.