IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejss/v4y2015i4p934-944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study on self-esteem of working and non-working women in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Fareda Zeab

    (Karachi University, Karachi, Pakistan)

  • Uzma Ali

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the difference of self-esteem between working and non-working women of Pakistan. It was hypothesized that ’’the working-women will score higher on the variable of Self-esteem as compare to non-working women. The sample of 250 (125 working, 125 non working) women were taken by purposive sampling technique. The target group’s age range was between 28 years to 45 years. The Mean score of age was (M =34.126) and the standard deviation was (SD= 4.129). The women were selected from different organizations and areas of Karachi, Pakistan through purposive sampling technique. After taking the permission from authorities and informed consent from the participant demographic forms were filled then in order to measure the self-esteem, Rosenberg self-esteem Scale (RSES, 1965) was administered, individually. Descriptive statistics and t-test for independent mean were used to analyze the data through SPSS. It was concluded that non-working women are likely to have higher self-esteem than working-women in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Fareda Zeab & Uzma Ali, 2015. "A comparative study on self-esteem of working and non-working women in Pakistan," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 4(4), pages 934-944, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:934-944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol4/No4/JSSarticle1,4(4)pp934-944.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Self-esteem; working women; mental health.;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:934-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA) or (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.