IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ein Literat und die Ökonomie – Enzensbergers An- und Einsichten über Utopien, Kapitalismus und Globalisierung / A Man of Letters and the Economy – Enzensbergers Views and Understanding of Utopias, Capitalism and Globalization

Listed author(s):
  • Starbatty Joachim


    (Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Nauklerstr. 47, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany)

Registered author(s):

    Though men of letters have a strong impact on public opinion and articulate strong judgments on their economic environment, economic evaluations of those reflections are rather rare. This article analyses the essays of Hans Magnus Enzensberger. It is shown that one cannot distinguish between Marx as the analyst of global capitalism and Marx as the prophet of a new world, as Enzensberger believes. Marx’s understanding of the capitalist world is developed from his deterministic view of history. Further on one cannot distinguish between good, freedom guaranteeing Utopias and bad Utopias, based on collectivistic force; rather all Utopias, abolishing private property as the cause of exploitation, will involve resort to force. Finally it is shown that Enzensberger’s arguments are contradictory. On the one side he sees men bounded to a global capitalism and complains that they have no alternative, and on the other side the social evolution is regarded as unpredictable and forecasts as principally uncertain. His second Statement is an implicit pleading for an open society, which implies decentralized property rights and is therefore anti-socialistic by nature.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).

    Volume (Year): 224 (2004)
    Issue (Month): 1-2 (February)
    Pages: 185-197

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:224:y:2004:i:1-2:p:185-197
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:224:y:2004:i:1-2:p:185-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.