IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v222y2002i6p656-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small is Beautiful?. Entwicklungslinien im Makroökonometrischen Modellbau / Small is Beautiful?. Tendencies in Macroeconometric Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Heilemann Ullrich

    (Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Hohenzollernstraße 1 - 3 , D-45128 Essen. Tel.: ++49/+2 01/8149-0, Fax: ++49/+2 01/8149-200)

Abstract

This paper examines macroeconometric-modelling tendencies in the big OECD countries from its beginnings in the 1930s to the 1990s. While the models grew in size, the number of definitions and exogenous variables increased much more than stochastic equations. These trends are the result of demand as well as of supply factors, with technology and information requests playing central roles. Particular attention is given to the question of model size. It is exposed that size should not be central criterion in judging models - size is the result and not the goal of modelling. The often-found association of “small and beautiful” and “big and ugly” is neither an adequate description of alternatives, nor are the associations valid. However, big models often appear as more complex and though this is basically a rather subjective judgment, model builders should devote more resources to make their models (and their practices) more transparent. The trend toward larger models may slow down but will not stop.

Suggested Citation

  • Heilemann Ullrich, 2002. "Small is Beautiful?. Entwicklungslinien im Makroökonometrischen Modellbau / Small is Beautiful?. Tendencies in Macroeconometric Modelling," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 222(6), pages 656-682, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:222:y:2002:i:6:p:656-682
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2002-0603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2002-0603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2002-0603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fehl Ulrich, 2004. "Theorie und Empirie aus evolutionsökonomischer Sicht / Theory and Empirical Facts in the Perspective of Evolutionary," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 224(1-2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Quaas, Georg, 2006. "Ganzheitliche Wirkungen von Dummyvariablen auf die Prognosegenauigkeit ökonometrischer Modelle – analysiert am Beispiel des RWI-Konjunkturmodells KM59 [Holistic effects of dummy variables on the fo," MPRA Paper 19028, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Dec 2009.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:222:y:2002:i:6:p:656-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.