IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Small is Beautiful?. Entwicklungslinien im Makroökonometrischen Modellbau / Small is Beautiful?. Tendencies in Macroeconometric Modelling

Listed author(s):
  • Heilemann Ullrich


    (Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Hohenzollernstraße 1 - 3 , D-45128 Essen. Tel.: ++49/+2 01/8149-0, Fax: ++49/+2 01/8149-200)

Registered author(s):

    This paper examines macroeconometric-modelling tendencies in the big OECD countries from its beginnings in the 1930s to the 1990s. While the models grew in size, the number of definitions and exogenous variables increased much more than stochastic equations. These trends are the result of demand as well as of supply factors, with technology and information requests playing central roles. Particular attention is given to the question of model size. It is exposed that size should not be central criterion in judging models - size is the result and not the goal of modelling. The often-found association of “small and beautiful” and “big and ugly” is neither an adequate description of alternatives, nor are the associations valid. However, big models often appear as more complex and though this is basically a rather subjective judgment, model builders should devote more resources to make their models (and their practices) more transparent. The trend toward larger models may slow down but will not stop.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).

    Volume (Year): 222 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 6 (December)
    Pages: 656-682

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:222:y:2002:i:6:p:656-682
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:222:y:2002:i:6:p:656-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.