IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doppelte „Dividende” oder nur doppelte „Funktion” von Arbeitsmarktreformen bei diskretionärer Geldpolitik? / Double “Dividend” or Double “Function” of Labour Market Reforms under Discretionary Monetary Policy?: Anmerkungen zum Calmfors-Modell / A Note on the Calmfors-Model


  • Belke Ansgar
  • Kamp Martina

    (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Europäische Wirtschaft, Universitätsstraße 150, D-44801 Bochum.)


A high natural rate of unemployment has been identified by the time inconsistency literature as the root cause of an inflation bias. Thus, a reduction of equilibrium unemployment and of the inflation bias requires fundamental reforms of labour market institutions. However, there has been little research on how participation in different monetary regimes affects incentives in favour of them. Here an extended Barro-Gordon model is used where monetary policy and the reforms are determined simultaneously. Impacts of different monetary regimes on labour markets crucially depend on the degree of the inflation bias and on the extent of its internalisation by national governments. However, some opponents to a monetary rule hold the prior that a monetary rule serves as a substitute for labour-market reform. Therefore, it does not lower unemployment significantly and leads to lower welfare than discretionary policy. This view is clearly rejected by our model. It is shown that a monetary rule generally leads to a higher total economy welfare than discretionary policy. Under the latter, an overshooting of reforms can be observed because reforms are needed more pressingly and a monetary rule is a superior (and ideally a perfect) instrument to internalise the inflation bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Belke Ansgar & Kamp Martina, 1999. "Doppelte „Dividende” oder nur doppelte „Funktion” von Arbeitsmarktreformen bei diskretionärer Geldpolitik? / Double “Dividend” or Double “Function” of Labour Market Reforms under Discretionary Monetar," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 219(5-6), pages 543-555, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:5-6:p:543-555

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:5-6:p:543-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.