IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Prognosequalitätsmatrix / Forecast Quality Matrix: Ein methodologischer Beitrag zur Beurteilung der Güte von Kapitalmarktprognosen / A Methodological Survey of Judging Forecast Quality of Capital Market Forecasts

Listed author(s):
  • Andres Peter

    (Eppendorfer Weg 271, D-20251 Hamburg)

  • Spiwoks Markus

    (Am Haag 38, D-65812 Bad Soden a. Ts.)

Registered author(s):

    Capital market forecasts sometimes suffer from a too intense orientation towards the current market situation and lose their future-orientated character. This phenomenon can be referred to as Topical Orientated Trend Adjustment (GOVA). For an individual statistic proof we develop a new instrument called GOVA coefficient. In a second step we combine the GOVA coefficient with the conventional forecast quality measure of Theil’s inequality coefficient. The result is the Forecast Quality Matrix. With this instrument, it is possible to verify whether the examined forecast is better or worse than the naive forecast and to exclude a Topical Orientated Trend Adjustment. This results in four different possibilities: 1. The forecast considering the future is an ideal case. This forecast is significantly better than a naive forecast and is not influenced by the market situation during the making of the forecast. 2. The quasi-naive forecast is characterized by a Topical Orientated Trend Adjustment, but is not better than the naive forecast. 3. The wrong forecast does not reflect the past, but unfortunately not even the future. 4. The direction-orientated forecast follows the past, but mostly indicates the correct market trend. This classification facilitates the evaluation of the practicability of forecasts and points out the reasons for a possibly lacking forecast accuracy.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).

    Volume (Year): 219 (1999)
    Issue (Month): 5-6 (October)
    Pages: 513-542

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:5-6:p:513-542
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:5-6:p:513-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.