IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v219y1999i1-2p127-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lohnbedingter Mismatch auf deutschen Arbeitsmärkten? Lehren aus einem Vergleich mit Portugal / Wage-Induced Mismatch on German Labour Markets? Lessons from Comparison with Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Entorf Horst

    (Universität Würzburg, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Sanderring 2, 97070 Würzburg)

Abstract

The German labour market performance is falling behind that of other European countries. Portugal, for instance, has decreasing unemployment rates, leading to a share of only 4.6 % unemployed persons in 1998 (Germany: 9.5 %). This paper sheds some light on the divergent development from a matching point of view. I present matching functions based on comparable panel data on hires, vacancies and unemployment at the occupational level for Portugal and Germany. Both countries reveal low matching elasticities with respect to unemployment. In Portugal, however, there is a strong upward trend of the matching efficiency, whereas Germany’s labour market has become less flexible over time. The analysis of the reasons is eased by availability of panel data. Because of high degrees of freedom, aggregate mismatch indicators are implemented as covariates of the matching trend. It turns out that the evolution of real wages is a significant factor of mismatch in Germany. There seems to be growing mismatch because the (demanded) feasible wage of firms does not coincide with reservation wages of labour supply. Moreover, the slow expansion of the service sector and the failing reintegration of women coming from out of the labour force are obstacles of more efficient matching in Germany. In Portugal, on the other hand, the reduction of minimum wages has significantly contributed to increased matching activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Entorf Horst, 1999. "Lohnbedingter Mismatch auf deutschen Arbeitsmärkten? Lehren aus einem Vergleich mit Portugal / Wage-Induced Mismatch on German Labour Markets? Lessons from Comparison with Portugal," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 219(1-2), pages 127-142, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:1-2:p:127-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jbnst.1999.219.issue-1-2/jbnst-1999-1-209/jbnst-1999-1-209.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:219:y:1999:i:1-2:p:127-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.