IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v217y1998i4p483-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoriegeschichte oder Theoriegeschichten?. Über den Status der ökonomischen Dogmengeschichte / History or Histories of Economic Thought?. On the State of the History of Economic Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Priddat Birger P.

    (Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, D-58448 Witten)

Abstract

There are two tendencies in the history of economic thought. One is the idea of unifying theory by reconstructing the older economic conceptions as forerunners of the modern core of economics. The other is the idea of plurality, which is not able to be reduced to theoretical homogenity. The first of these tendencies is dominant, the second one is becoming more and more discussed. But there are good reasons for looking on the unifying tendency as only one story beneath other possible one's. Unifying history of economic thought is not exclusive. Contrarily, the idea of pluralism in the history of economic thought may be well defined, but has to be completed by an epistemological conception of the relevance of contextes. Different theories in different times are embedded in different contextes, most of them not economic one's. Theoreticans in the history of economic thought are not absolutely free in choosing their contextes, but they are also not free in ignoring them. Beyond the unifying idea of reconstructing older economic theories in the mode of modern theory, and beyond the classical hermeneutical approach, it seems better to do the job by reflecting contextspecifity of economic theories. This idea is even guilty for modern economic theory itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Priddat Birger P., 1998. "Theoriegeschichte oder Theoriegeschichten?. Über den Status der ökonomischen Dogmengeschichte / History or Histories of Economic Thought?. On the State of the History of Economic Thought," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 217(4), pages 483-498, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:217:y:1998:i:4:p:483-498
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-1998-0407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-1998-0407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-1998-0407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:217:y:1998:i:4:p:483-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.