IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jle/journl/jlecon8306.html

Analysis of knowledge performance of G7 countries: An application with the COCOSO method

Author

Listed:
  • Furkan Fahri ALTINTAÅ

    (Jandarma Genel Komutanligi/TURKEY)

Abstract

In this research, the knowledge performance of the G7 countries was measured by the COCOSO method over the values of the latest and up-to-date Global Konwledge Index (GKI) components of the 2020 year. In the study, the harmony between the performance values determined within the scope of GKI and COCOSO methods and some multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM:, EDAS, TOPSIS, and GIA) were determined. According to the findings, it has been determined that the countries with higher information performance average values are the USA and the England. In this context, it has been concluded that the countries of Japan, Canada, Germany, Italy and France, which are below the average value, should give the necessary importance to the components of the Global Knowledge Index in order to harmonize with other G7 group countries in terms of knowledge performance. According to another finding, it was observed that the GKI and COCOSO methods were in consistence with each other and with other MCDM methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Furkan Fahri ALTINTAÅ, 2021. "Analysis of knowledge performance of G7 countries: An application with the COCOSO method," JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS, Holistence Publications, vol. 8(3), pages 337-347.
    • Handle: RePEc:jle:journl:jlecon8306
    DOI: 10.15637/jlecon.8.3.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jle:journl:jlecon8306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mehmet SAHIN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.gen.tr/index.php/jlecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.