IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jle/joujos/jos2725.html

Navigating organizational culture: The impact on cognitive dissonance, satisfaction, and well-being of Turkish workers

Author

Listed:
  • Naimal Haq

    (Halic University / Turkiye)

  • Nuri Gokhan Torlak

    (Halic University / Turkiye)

Abstract

The study’s purpose is to understand the influence of two culture types - Hierarchy Culture (HC) and Adhocracy Culture (AC)â€"on employee outcomes - cognitive dissonance (CD), employee satisfaction (ES), and employee well-being (EWB). The aim of the research is to understand these dynamics especially in Turkish organizations to provide managerial insights that minimizes negative outcomes for employees. A self-administered questionnaire was used to gather data from 380 participants working in Turkiye. After collecting data, statistical analyses such as Cronbach’s alpha, t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, and regression analysis were employed to explore the relationship between the variables. Findings indicate that HC has a strong positive relationship with cognitive dissonance, however, it has a weak positive relationship with employee satisfaction and well-being. Whereas AC shows a moderate negative relationship with cognitive dissonance and a moderate positive relationship with employee satisfaction. Moreover, AC also demonstrates a weak negative effect on employee well-being. The results suggest that hierarchical cultures may contribute to psychological discomfort, but it also increases levels of satisfaction and wellbeing. This could be due to HC’s ability to offer predictability. In contrast, AC fosters a flexible culture which reduces CD but may result in uncertainty which can lead to stress. These results offer valuable insight into the dynamics of Turkish workplaces. The importance of aligning organizational cultures with employee expectations to enhance productivity and wellbeing of the employees can be seen through the findings.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:jle:joujos:jos2725
DOI: 10.47243/jos.2725
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jle:joujos:jos2725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mehmet Sahin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.gen.tr/index.php/jos .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.