IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jle/joujam/jame1202.html

Income inequality-labor productivity relationship: CS-ARDL approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hilal Baglitas

    (Erciyes University/TURKEY)

Abstract

With the acceleration of globalization, “Reducing Inequalitiesâ€, which is the 10th of the sustainable development goals, has started to attract more attention in the world. Many factors lead to inequality. Therefore, inequality requires consensus and strength at the interdisciplinary, local, national, and international levels. The leading indicator of inequality is income inequality. Its measurability and widespread impact are sources of its importance and priority. Unfair income distribution might have unfavorable effects on employees such as being more reluctant to work and the well-being of workers. In addition, if workers believe they earn less than they deserve, this might negatively affect the labor productivity. Ultimately, this process may cause countries to reduce their production output. This study aims to explore the link between income inequality and labor productivity among 31 countries in Europe with the period of 2005-2019. To do this, a cross-sectional auto-regressive distributed lag model (CS-ARDL) is employed. According to the results, wage inequality damages the productivity of labor. A 1% increase in the wage inequality reduces labor productivity by 0.16%. Moreover, the unequal income distribution has an explanatory power of approximately 33% on the decrease in productivity. This helps to determine the possible effects of the unequal income distribution leading towards two targets. These targets are to create an efficient wage structure and eliminate the destructive effects of inequality, respectively. In terms of the policy effectiveness, simultaneous application of tools may be more beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilal Baglitas, 2021. "Income inequality-labor productivity relationship: CS-ARDL approach," Journal of Applied Microeconometrics, Holistence Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 101-111.
  • Handle: RePEc:jle:joujam:jame1202
    DOI: 10.53753/jame.1.2.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jle:joujam:jame1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mehmet SAHIN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.gen.tr/index.php/jame .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.