Pro-Poor Growth and the Lognormal Distribution
A widely accepted criterion for the pro-poorness of an income growth pattern is that it should reduce a (chosen) measure of poverty by more than if all incomes were growing equi-proportionately. Inequality reduction is not generally seen as either necessary or sufficient for pro-poorness. As empirical income distributions fit well to the lognormal form, lognormality has sometimes been assumed in order to determine analytically the poverty effects of income growth. We show that in a lognormal world, growth is pro-poor in the above sense, if and only if it is inequality-reducing. It follows that lognormality may not be a good paradigm by means of which to examine pro-poorness issues. In contrast, some popular 3-parameter forms offer the ability to conduct nuanced investigation of the pro-poorness growth-inequality nexus.
Volume (Year): 19 (2010)
Issue (Month): 3-4 (September-December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://pi.library.yorku.ca/ojs/index.php/jid/indexEmail:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jid:journl:y:2010:v:19:i:3-4:p:88-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benjamin Nicholls)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.