IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jid/journl/y1996v05i2p2-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the Allocation Problem and the Underlying Image of Man that Supports It

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Mischel

Abstract

This paper calls into question the adequacy of the metaphor that the institutions endemic to a society form a social contract, conformed to and created by autonomous individuals for the sake of mutual benefit, as a basis upon which to build understandings of institutions and their change. A counterexample to Demsetz’s theory of the development of property rights, a pillar of the “new” institutional economics and exemplar of the use of the metaphor, is developed. Assessment of the metaphor has been hampered by the lack of a common framework and a common language, within the context of which discussion between its supporters and critics might fruitfully proceed. Accordingly, the case against the metaphor is made while adopting the assumptions, terminology and methods of those who typically support it.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Mischel, 1996. "Rethinking the Allocation Problem and the Underlying Image of Man that Supports It," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 5(2), pages 2-2, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jid:journl:y:1996:v:05:i:2:p:2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jid.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jid/article/view/679
    Download Restriction: Some fulltext downloads are only available to subscribers. See JID website for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jid:journl:y:1996:v:05:i:2:p:2-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Timm Boenke (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gyorkca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.