Author
Abstract
The Ramayana, a seminal work in ancient Indian literature, is an epic narrative that is traditionally attributed to the illustrious sage Valmiki, who is known for his profound contributions to the literary and spiritual heritage of India. The Ramayana stands as a remarkable repository of ethical values and moral teachings that persistently influence societal norms and values across generations. The pivotal tenets of dharma, satyam, bhakti, seva, vairagya, karma, and sacrifice constitute the very essence of this epic. In addition to the Ramayana, the Mahabharata stands as one of the two grand epics that collectively represent the pinnacle of ancient Indian literary achievement, and it provides profound philosophical and moral teachings that continue to be relevant in contemporary discourse. Objective: The aim of the study is to distinguish between Ramayana and Mahabharata and to examine which is more effective in context of today’s modern life. Methods: This study is descriptive and empirical by nature based on secondary sources. Results and Discussion: The differences between the Ramayana and Mahabharata have been sought in connection of Themes and Narrative Focus, The Central Characters, Plot Structure, Philosophical and Ethical Teachings, Ethical Dilemmas and Decision-Making, etc. Conclusion: Both of these ancient epics proffer lasting insights into the realms of governance and leadership that remain relevant today. The Ramayana establishes a benchmark for virtuous conduct and a sense of duty, while the Mahabharata meticulously dissects the pragmatic aspects of power dynamics and ethical conflicts inherent in leadership.
Suggested Citation
Ram Krishna Mandal, 2025.
"Distinguish Between Ramayana And Mahabharata: Which Is More Effective In Context Of Modern Life,"
Journal of Global Economy, Research Centre for Social Sciences,Mumbai, India, vol. 21(2), pages 59-70, June.
Handle:
RePEc:jge:journl:2121
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
- Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jge:journl:2121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr J K Sachdeva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rcssindia.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.