IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jms111/v12y2021i3p10-21.html

To Keep Close or to Let Loose: Recipe for Sustainable Quality Dyad

Author

Listed:
  • Medina Halako Twalib

Abstract

This study¡¯s objective was to determine factors that that sustain a quality dyad. Leaders are known to consciously and sub consciously form two groups; in-group and outgroup members. Studies have revealed that in-group members work overtime and perform extra duties and in turn, get favours from the leaders including career mobility and access to information, among other favours. Literature is unclear on how these groups are formed and this paper embarked on finding out the recipe of the formation and sustainability of a quality dyad. It was hypothesised that being a male member, trust and competence are not recipes of a high-quality relationship. Descriptive survey was employed; a population of 19 leaders were responding to questions about their 169 employees who report to them directly. Primary data was collected using semi-structured questionnaires.122 pairs of leaders and their direct reports was the response rate (72.2%). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. The hypothesis was tested using logistical regression technique. The results showed that competence and trust are the recipe for an inclusion into the in-group of a leader. Gender, on the other hand, was not a recipe for a sustainable quality dyadic relationship. It is recommended that employees should ensure high level trustworthiness and competence for them to be kept close by the leader. The paper suggests that more variables can be considered as recipes for the quality dyadic relationship. These findings add significant value on both theory, policy and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Medina Halako Twalib, 2021. "To Keep Close or to Let Loose: Recipe for Sustainable Quality Dyad," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 10-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:10-21
    DOI: 10.5430/jms.v12n3p10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/21024/12944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/21024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/jms.v12n3p10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bill McEvily & Marco Tortoriello, 2010. "Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 23-63, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:10-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jms.sciedupress.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.