IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v7y2016i5p203-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Listing Requirements and Market Quality: An Examination Using NASDAQ¡¯s Tiered Market Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin D. Broom
  • Jason S. Turner

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between listing requirements and market quality. Related studies analyzed market quality by focusing on disclosure requirements, while neglecting potential effects from listing requirements. Most of these studies failed to control for different market structures, thereby creating joint hypothesis problems. Using the unique structure of NASDAQ, We examine market quality while controlling for disclosure requirements and market structure. We find a significant relationship exists between listing requirements and four measures of market quality. The results indicate that listing requirements represent the types of information revealed, whereas disclosure requirements represent the mechanism through which markets reveal information.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin D. Broom & Jason S. Turner, 2016. "The Relationship between Listing Requirements and Market Quality: An Examination Using NASDAQ¡¯s Tiered Market Structure," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(5), pages 203-220, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:5:p:203-220
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v7n5p203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/10433/6358
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/10433
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v7n5p203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:5:p:203-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.