IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v7y2016i1p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-cultural Differences in Interpreting IAS 37 Probability Phrases

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Du
  • Kevin Stevens
  • John Ahern
  • Anton Shigaev

Abstract

The adoption of IFRS throughout much of the world means that accountants from different cultures will be interpreting the same set of different standards through different cultural lenses. IAS 37 relies on some particularly nebulous terminology. i.e., probable, more likely than not, and remote, that are difficult to interpret even within a culture. Building on prior research, this study explores whether accountants in different cultures interpret verbal probability phrases differently. We compare the ability of US accounting students to interpret the verbal probability of these terms to that of Russian accounting students and find these two groups differ in translating verbal phrases into numeric values but are quite consistent in their application of the accrual or disclosure decision criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Du & Kevin Stevens & John Ahern & Anton Shigaev, 2016. "Cross-cultural Differences in Interpreting IAS 37 Probability Phrases," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:1-8
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v7n1p1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/8407/5051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/8407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v7n1p1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.