Author
Listed:
- Leslie J. Wardley
- Kerri-Anne Mullen
- Charles H. Belanger
- Robert D. Reid
Abstract
Background: Globally, use of tobacco has been identified as one of the greatest risk factors for mortality and the leading cause of preventable death. The purpose of this paper was to apply the lens of a business change model to the healthcare sector to better understand forces driving the implementation of smoking cessation programs and to identify ways to overcome resistance to changes in smoking behaviour and protocols. Methods: This paper used a case study approach. Through the interpretation of real-life situations and problems faced by researchers at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI), the relationship between society¡¯s view towards smoking (drivers of change) and the unique issues encountered when implementing smoking cessation programs (barriers to behavioural change) were explored. Results: Legislation and health centre regulations have been drivers of change; however, the government-authorized sale of tobacco is still a significant barrier to overcome. At the organizational level, goals and objectives are not clearly defined which resulted in confusion regarding participants¡¯ roles, duties and performance standards. At the practitioner level, physicians who demonstrated a lack of confidence in their ability to counsel patients about quitting offer fewer clinical cessation activities. At the patient level, many smokers associate smoking with activities they enjoyed and believed smoking improved their ability to cope with stress, anxiety and/or boredom. Conclusions: Stronger legislation and making smoking cessation part of the healthcare institution¡¯s mission to provide quality care and outreach, can clarify the importance of developing objectives to attain these goals among key stakeholders.
Suggested Citation
Leslie J. Wardley & Kerri-Anne Mullen & Charles H. Belanger & Robert D. Reid, 2014.
"Organizational Development: Driving Forces and Barriers Encountered when Implementing Smoking Cessation Programs,"
International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 19-29, May.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:19-29
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.