Author
Listed:
- Marco Tulio Ospina Patino
- Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim
- Alequexandre Galvez de Andrade
- Mohammad Jahangir Alam
- Federico Del Giorgio Solfa
Abstract
The diversity in agronomic practices being used by sugarcane producers in Brazil determines differences in economic performance and cost structure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost of six systems of agronomic practices using fixed or variable rates for soil amendment, fertilizer, and defensive applications and assess the profitability of these systems at three scales of sugarcane production. We then describe the data sample related to the 2019¨C2020 harvest season and collected from fifty-five sugarcane producers in the central-south region of Brazil. Thereafter, using a quantitative approach, a cost analysis was performed, and the cumulative frequency of the net revenue for the three scales of production (small, medium, and large), was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The cost analysis indicated that fertilizer had the highest cost considering the agronomic practices adopted at the three scales of production analyzed. The cumulative frequency analysis results from the Monte Carlo simulation showed the highest net revenue per hectare for medium sugarcane producers. In addition, the presence of economies of scale was not confirmed because the lowest cost was found in small-scale sugarcane producers and the highest net revenue was obtained by medium-scale sugarcane producers.
Suggested Citation
Marco Tulio Ospina Patino & Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim & Alequexandre Galvez de Andrade & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Federico Del Giorgio Solfa, 2022.
"Costs of Agronomic Practices: Profitability at Different Scales of Sugarcane Production in Brazil,"
International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(5), pages 32-43, September.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:32-43
DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v13n5p32
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:32-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.