IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2025v16p74-96.html

Assessing the global value chain trade structure of the EU, RCEP and TPP through trade network analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Kaur

    (Central University of Punjab, India)

  • Harpreet Singh

    (Central University of Punjab, India)

  • Ekta Verma

    (Central University of Punjab, India)

Abstract

Using network analysis, the study examines the trade structure of the three largest trade blocs, the European Union (EU), the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The use of intermediate goods exports data from the OECD TIVA database to assess the trade flow among member countries. It employs centrality measures such as centrality degree, eigenvector, betweenness, and closeness to identify the complex network flow of trade and the extent of trade concentration to countries within each bloc. The results reveal that the EU and RCEP supply chains are dominated by Germany and China, respectively. However, other countries are also acting as a central hub in the EU bloc. Similarly, the CPTPP supply chain is governed by nations such as South Korea, Japan, and Canada. Overall, the EU and RCEP have a dense trade network where countries have deep integration for efficient trade flow. In contrast, in CPTPP, the developed countries have higher participation, and the underdeveloped countries have less participation in trade flow. The findings provide important implications that high dependence on the central hub potentially poses the vulnerability of external/ internal shock in regional trade partnerships. Furthermore, high-quality standards favour developed nations and hinder underdeveloped nations' participation in regional trade partnerships.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Kaur & Harpreet Singh & Ekta Verma, 2025. "Assessing the global value chain trade structure of the EU, RCEP and TPP through trade network analysis," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 16, pages 74-96, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2025:v:16:p:74-96
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-SI05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2025_16SI_05_KAU.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-SI05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2025:v:16:p:74-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.