IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2025v16(1)p150-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values? A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Stoian

    (“Mihai Viteazul†National Intelligence Academy, Romania)

Abstract

The beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 reignited the study of strategic narratives employed by the main actors involved in the conflict. This article focuses on a three-way comparison between the strategic narratives employed to justify action in Ukraine by the European Union, the United States and the Russian Federation. It argues that, consistent with previous findings, the US and EU conceptualize the conflict as one between systems of government and values while Russia describes it as a geopolitical competition for power, disguised as a conflict of values. While the former focus on liberal values and the rules-based order, the latter emphasizes state sovereignty and multipolarity as the correct situation to be maintained. While expected, an increase of the value-based narratives in Russian discourse was not identified. However, when adopting value-based narratives, Russia focused on the traditional family and maintaining natural hierarchies.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Stoian, 2025. "Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values? A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022–2023)," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 16, pages 150-172, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2025:v:16(1):p:150-172
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-0107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2025_1601_07_STO.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-0107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2025:v:16(1):p:150-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.