IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2022v9p68-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Build Better - Enforce Systems Using Policies’ Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ileana-Sabina CHIABURU

    (The Romanian National School of Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Within the transformations of systems, government procurement could be used as a lever when addressing the challenge of fair access to goods and services in times of crisis as COVID-19. To find adequate solutions and raise the capacity for a quick response in public administration, the European methodological framework stipulates that evaluation must play an important role. The hypothesis is that developing a system of public policy evaluation should be a priority. The main research question is: how does policy evaluation contribute to better planning, results, and future development? To respond to that I investigated using mixed methods like interviews held under the Chatham House rule, questionnaires with closed and open answers, literature and documents review, also open databases of OECD, EU DG Growth, and others. I concluded with a proposal for a design of an evaluation unit, built at a theoretical level, in a contracting authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Ileana-Sabina CHIABURU, 2022. "Build Better - Enforce Systems Using Policies’ Evaluation," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9, pages 68-91, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2022:v:9:p:68-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurint.uaic.ro/proceedings/articles/EURINT2022_CHI.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihaela AIOANEI, 2016. "Improving Structural Interventions Through The Evaluation Process. Case Study - The Regional Operational Program Of Romania 2007 – 2013," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 1-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2022:v:9:p:68-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.