IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.56year2022issue4pp65-77.html

The Relationship Between Public Social Security Expenditures and Poverty, Income Inequality, and GDP Growth: An Empirical Case Study of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Abdul Hannan Pradhan
  • Rahim Quazi

    (Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
    Prairie View A&M University, USA)

Abstract

During recent years, public social security programs for the poor and vulnerable groups in Bangladesh have grown both in number and size. The primary goal of these programs is to lift people out of poverty and to contribute to national economic development. The objective of this article is to quantify the relationship between public social security expenditures and poverty, income inequality, and GDP growth in Bangladesh. The study uses multivariate time series data from 1991 to 2019 and applies the Johansen cointegration test and the Vector Error Correction (VEC) modeling methodology. There are three dependent variables - poverty rate, Gini coefficient, and GDP growth rate, while public social security expenses, GDP per capita, active working-age population aged 15-64, elderly population aged above 65, gross capital formation, share of population aged 25-64 with tertiary (post-secondary) education, inflation, and export earnings as a share of GDP are used as the explanatory variables. The estimated results suggest that public social security expenditures have significant effects on gross capital formation, but not on either poverty or income inequality in the short run in Bangladesh. In addition, capital formation, public social security expenditures, elderly population, and export earnings are found to have significant positive effects on GDP growth in the long run. Higher levels of GDP should generate more resources for the government coffers, enabling the government to expand the social security programs by targeting higher numbers of beneficiaries and offering higher amounts of benefits, which in turn can contribute to further GDP growth. This study also finds that public social security expenditures have no significant effect on income inequality in Bangladesh in either short run or long run. However, the general hypothesis is that social security transfers to lower-income groups may help with reducing income inequality. In many developing countries, governments allocate and distribute inadequate amounts of money to targeted communities, which results in only marginal changes in inequality. The lesson for the policymakers in Bangladesh is to overhaul the existing social security programs that evidently have had marginal effects on reducing income inequality, and may even have worsened poverty in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Abdul Hannan Pradhan & Rahim Quazi, 2022. "The Relationship Between Public Social Security Expenditures and Poverty, Income Inequality, and GDP Growth: An Empirical Case Study of Bangladesh," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(4), pages 65-77, October–D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue4:pp:65-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/51/article/862007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue4:pp:65-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.