Author
Listed:
- Ashkan Mirzay Fashami
(IBSS, XJTLU, China)
Abstract
Most prior studies on non-audit services (NAS) and audit quality in Australia predated the Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act 2004 (CLERP 9). Australia enacted CLERP 9 to improve corporate governance through the improvement of transparency, accountability, and rights of shareholders. No regulatory changes after CLERP 9 exist that can directly affect the relationship between NAS and audit quality in Australia. Hence, this study examines the effects of NAS on audit quality in Australia. Australian Securities Exchangte (ASX) Listing Rules mandate ASX 300 companies to establish an audit committee and provide a summary of their audit committee charters. The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) prepares standards that govern audits under the Australian Corporations Act. The AUASB auditing standards, under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, took effect from July 2006. Therefore, this study examines NAS data of ASX 300 companies from 2006 to 2016 - 10 years - to obtain sufficient data. This study has recourse to other databases such as Connect 4, Morningstar, and the companies’ annual reports to gather other relevant data. Three widely accepted measures of audit quality are used, namely going-concern audit opinions, Big Four auditors, and discretionary accruals, to measure the effects of NAS on audit quality. This study excludes initial audit engagements to alleviate the effects of the timing of auditor switches on fees. This research results suggest that NAS do not impair (or even improve) audit quality. This study contributes to the current debate regarding the relationship between NAS and audit quality. Our findings are important to regulators and standard setters, such as the AUASB. Findings inform these bodies that the current regulatory environment safeguards audit quality in Australia. Thus, proposals to ban NAS are not necessary, because NAS do not deteriorate audit quality. Further, this study supports the knowledge spillover hypothesis: it shows that economic and social bonding of NAS does not encourage auditors to sacrifice their independence and reduce their audit quality. Thus, this study suggests that audit firms should continue to provide NAS to their audit clients in Australia. Future research could extend this study by analyzing the effects of different types of NAS on audit quality.
Suggested Citation
Ashkan Mirzay Fashami, 2022.
"Non-Audit Services and Audit Quality: Recent Evidence from Australia,"
Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(3), pages 357-381, July–Sept.
Handle:
RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue3:pp:357-381
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue3:pp:357-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.