IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.55year2021issue1pp357-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Quality, Macroeconomic Factors And Stock Market Volatility: A Cross-Country Analysis For Pre, During And Post Global Financial Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Sarod Khandaker
  • Omar Al Farooque

    (Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
    University of New England, Australia)

Abstract

This paper investigates how stock market volatility of Ten (10) developed and Seven (7) emerging economies were affected by the institutional quality and macroeconomic factors using data from 2001 to 2012. Applying the standard historical volatility model adopted by Jones et al. (1998) and Andersen and Bollerslev (1998) we find that stock market of the sample countries was volatile during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and these effects were statistically significant for the sample emerging countries as well as developed country groups. There is evidence that the sample emerging stock markets exhibited higher stock return volatility than developed stock markets during the observation period. We also find that stock return time-series variables were not stationary over the study period at 1 per cent difference. The study uses the fixed-effects approach to determine the institutional quality and macroeconomic factors that impacted higher stock market volatility for the sample emerging and developed country group. Aligned with institutional theory, we also document that several institutional quality country-level governance indicators and macroeconomic variables are statistically correlated with the stock market volatility during the observation period. For example, we find evidence that some institutional quality and macroeconomic indicators such as rule of law, and credit information have a significantly negative effect on stock market volatility, while other macroeconomic variables such as carbon dioxide (Co2) emission, tax revenue, and board money have a significant positive association with stock market volatility. These findings suggest that our sample markets were volatile not only because of the other macroeconomic factors but also for institutional quality factors. The robustness test also produces similar results with little variation. The findings of this investigation have several policy implications. First, there is evidence that stock markets of the developed and emerging countries were volatile during the GFC and the rule of law appears to be the dominant factor in deterring the stock market volatility. Further, several macroeconomic and fiscal factors, including Co2 emission, tax revenue and board money may seem to be a potential barrier for international investment and portfolio diversification. Therefore, an international investor needs to be careful on portfolio diversification while investing in a poorly structured economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarod Khandaker & Omar Al Farooque, 2021. "Institutional Quality, Macroeconomic Factors And Stock Market Volatility: A Cross-Country Analysis For Pre, During And Post Global Financial Crisis," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 55(1), pages 357-378, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.55:year:2021:issue1:pp:357-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/51/article/766456
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.55:year:2021:issue1:pp:357-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.