Author
Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of foreign direct investment on domestic investment and the role of local conditions. Local conditions determine the extent to which host countries can absorb and hence benefit from FDI. We assess conditions under which FDI is likely to be beneficial or inimical to development in Africa. We apply the fixed effects and the two-step system GMM estimation techniques for 48 African economies from 1980 to 2016. We use gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) as a percentage of GDP as a proxy for domestic investment (DI) as our dependent variable. We use the following control variables: growth rate in real GDP (RGDP); savings as a percentage of GDP; and inflation. We also control for openness, financial sector development and institutional quality. We use annual data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI), the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) International Financial Statistics, the UNCTAD database and the Freedom House database. We find that there is a negative relationship between FDI and domestic investment, suggesting that FDI has a crowding-out effect. The negative association may also imply that countries with lower domestic investment attract more FDI because there are more domestically unsatisfied opportunities for foreign investors. However, the negative relationship between FDI and domestic investment does not necessarily imply that FDI has no benefits. It could as well be that the positive benefits from FDI in Africa may be as a result of an increase in total factor productivity (TFP) which more than compensates for the decline in domestic investment. The study also finds that improved institutions and trade openness mitigate the negative effect of FDI on domestic investment while financial market development exacerbates the negative effect. Policy efforts aimed at attracting FDI should be balanced with the imperative of strengthening institutions and domestic firms. A number of scholars have shown that that even in those countries where FDI has been more productive, domestic investment is more effective than FDI in promoting growth. Investment incentives should therefore not discriminate against domestic investors. Market regulations to dismantle the monopolistic tendencies of some foreign investors must be strengthened.
Suggested Citation
Prosper Chitambara, 2021.
"Fdi And Domestic Investment In Africa: Evidence On The Role Of Local Conditions,"
Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 55(1), pages 219-234, January-M.
Handle:
RePEc:jda:journl:vol.55:year:2021:issue1:pp:219-234
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
- F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
- F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
- O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.55:year:2021:issue1:pp:219-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.