IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.54year2020issue4pp17-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Transfer And Productivity Growth- Evidence From Indian Manufacturing Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Chandrima Sikdar
  • Kakali Mukhopadhyay

    (School of Business Management, NMIMS University, India
    Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, India, McGill University, Canada)

Abstract

Acquisition of technology and its diffusion foster productivity growth. Developing countries across the world have relied largely on technology import from developed countries for driving their technological changes. India too has been no exception. Against this backdrop, the present paper assesses the role of technology transfer in promoting productivity growth in Indian manufacturing industries. Foreign technology may be imported into a country via three channels, namely, trade channel, investment channel and license channel. India witnessed manifold increase in the importance of these channels of technology transfer since its economic liberalization in the early nineties. Using industry level secondary data on- productivity, import of capital and intermediate goods, FDI and Royalty and license fee, the present paper works out two econometric models. Model 1 evaluates changes in productivity levels within the industry importing the technology while model 2 examines changes in productivity levels of the industries upstream of the technology importing sectors. Results from two-way panel estimations show that import of technology via import of capital and other intermediate goods did lead to productivity growth in the technology importing sectors. However, this downstream import of capital goods and intermediate goods failed to penetrate and impact the productivity of the upstream input supplying sectors. Neither did downstream FDI result in improving the productivity of the upstream sectors. Thus, productivity growth that has happened in India due to technology import are those within the raw materials and capital goods importing sectors and via the trade channel of technology transfer. But unfortunately, no import penetration that positively impacts productivity has happened among domestic firms that supply inputs to either the input importing downstream sectors or the foreign invested downstream sectors. With India’s renewed focus on increasing output share and productivity of manufacturing sector, such nonpenetration of technology imports is definitely not good news. Usage of foreign technology to increase productivity may be a short run solution to attaining better productivity, but one has to learn from this imported knowledge and it should result in penetration and learning across industries so that the growth in productivity may be sustained over the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandrima Sikdar & Kakali Mukhopadhyay, 2020. "Technology Transfer And Productivity Growth- Evidence From Indian Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 54(4), pages 17-32, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.54:year:2020:issue4:pp:17-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/738670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity; Technology transfer; India; Manufacturing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • F4 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.54:year:2020:issue4:pp:17-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.