IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.52year2018issue3pp183-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Economic Freedom Promote Human Development? New Evidence from a Cross-National Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cephas Naanwaab

    (North Carolina A&T State University, USA)

Abstract

Previous studies of the relationship between economic freedom and human development have generally used either life expectancy, literacy rates, or subjective well-being as indicators of human development. These indicators tend to measure only some aspect of human development, ignoring other important attributes. For example, life expectancy alone is not an adequate indicator because a long life plagued by disease, malnutrition, and poverty does not constitute human development. To overcome these shortcomings the present paper uses an all-encompassing measure—the human development index—and two other less commonly used indicators: infant and maternal mortality rates. Thus, the paper analyzes the effect of economic freedom on these three indicators of human development in a sample of 88 countries. The paper uses economic freedom index constructed by the Fraser Institute and Human Development Index of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Conditional Quantile regression method is used to address the differential impacts of economic freedom across the distribution of human development. The results show that the effect of economic freedom varies across quantiles of the human development index, infant mortality, and maternal mortality. At lower quantiles of infant mortality the effect is small (-3.72 at the 0.10 quantile) and larger at the upper quantiles (-8.88 at the 0.90 quantile). To put these effects into perspective, for every country whose infant mortality rate is at the 10th percentile, a unit increase on its economic freedom index can be expected to reduce infant mortality by 3.7 deaths per 1,000 live births. For countries at the 90th percentile of infant mortality, it would reduce by 8.9 deaths per 1,000 live births. Concerning maternal mortality, the effect also varies across the quantiles from -6.59 at the 10th quantile to -36.55 at the 90th quantile. Thus, at the 10th percentile, a one-unit increase on the economic freedom index would only reduce maternal mortality by roughly 6.5 deaths per 100, 000 live births, while at the 90th percentile it would reduce maternal mortality by 36.5 per 100, 000 live births. At lower quantiles of the HDI distribution, economic freedom tends to have a pronounced effect and then levels off from the middle to upper quantiles. The opposite is true for infant and maternal mortality rates. The policy implication of these findings is that countries that have the least human development have the most to gain from improvement in economic freedom.

Suggested Citation

  • Cephas Naanwaab, 2018. "Does Economic Freedom Promote Human Development? New Evidence from a Cross-National Study," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(3), pages 183-198, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue3:pp:183-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/677942
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olalekan Charles Okunlola & Anthony E. Akinlo, 2021. "Does economic freedom enhance quality of life in Africa?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 68(3), pages 357-387, September.
    2. Chris Desmond & Kathryn Watt & Sara Naicker & Jere Behrman & Linda Richter, 2024. "Girls' schooling is important but insufficient to promote equality for boys and girls in childhood and across the life course," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(1), January.
    3. Aleksandras Krylovas & Rūta Dadelienė & Natalja Kosareva & Stanislav Dadelo, 2019. "Comparative Evaluation and Ranking of the European Countries Based on the Interdependence between Human Development and Internal Security Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Nerajda Feruni & Eglantina Hysa & Mirela Panait & Irina Gabriela Rădulescu & Alina Brezoi, 2020. "The Impact of Corruption, Economic Freedom and Urbanization on Economic Development: Western Balkans versus EU-27," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Olalekan C. Okunlola & Olumide A. Ayetigbo, 2022. "Economic Freedom and Human Development in ECOWAS: Does Political-Institutional Strength Play a Role?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 1751-1785, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic freedom; Human development; Quantile regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue3:pp:183-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.