IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.52year2018issue1pp131-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Structures And Economic Development: Empirical Evidence From Brics Countries And Mauritius

Author

Listed:
  • Jugurnath Bhavish
  • Elahee A
  • Fauzel Sheereen
  • Soondram Hema

    (University of Mauritius, Mauritius)

Abstract

This empirical study analyzes the implications of financial structure for country’s economic development. In recent years a considerable attention is paid to this issue in the scientific literature, however, there is a lack of empirical studies on this issue, especially investigating the relationship between the structure of financial system and economic development. The aim of this paper is to investigate empirical link between the structure of financial system and economic growth in BRICS countries. By applying the pooled mean group estimator to a large panel up to 6 countries over the 1980–2012 periods, this study finds that financial structure is significantly cointegrated to both Financial Development and economic growth. In particular, the relationship is positive in nature, suggesting that more market-based countries enjoy faster economic growth but suffer more from economic fluctuations in the long run. Accordingly, in sharp contrast to the existing evidences, we conclude that the architecture of an economy’s financial system matters for real sector performance. Based on the research results it can also be stated that the relationship between the structure of financial system and economic development exists, i.e. the level of country’s economic development is higher in countries with market-based financial system. It can also can be stated that countries that can be characterized by mixed and market-based financial systems are better economic developed. As policy recommendation, the banking sectors of all the countries must be further developed since its indicator suggest a very significant positive relationship between banks and economic growth. The channel through which credit is given to the private sector must be further enhanced and this can be a policy measure for banks. In conducting this study, we found out that BRICS and Mauritius are more bank-based economies but nevertheless, stock markets also contributed to economic growth. So, a recommendation would be that the stock markets in these countries be given a boost to be developed so as to further enhance economic development, hence helping them to gain more weight on being developed. It can be anticipated that financial development will play a more prominent role in the overall economic performance in the future; however, these economies should be able to get the right mix of their financial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Jugurnath Bhavish & Elahee A & Fauzel Sheereen & Soondram Hema, 2018. "Financial Structures And Economic Development: Empirical Evidence From Brics Countries And Mauritius," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(1), pages 131-155, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue1:pp:131-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/676870
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial structure; Economic growth; Growth volatility; Pooled mean group estimator;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue1:pp:131-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.