IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue4pp95-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External financial flows and economic growth in the SADC region: An Application of the Granger Causality Test in Panel Data Model

Author

Listed:
  • Karla Borja

    (The University of Tampa, USA)

Abstract

Developing countries have experienced an unprecedented flow of foreign capitals from three main sources: foreign aid, foreign direct investment (FDI), and remittances, namely, the private transfers from immigrant workers back to their home countries. These funds might sound good news for countries historically constrained by limited savings and financial resources. However, these same economies have productive structures embedded in weak institutional frameworks, poor governance and corruption, hindering the effective use of foreign capital on productivity and economic growth. We undertake a comparative analysis of these three foreign capital inflows in developing countries for a period of 30 years, from 1985 to 2014. Different from the conventional approach of selecting a single source of foreign capital, and a single indicator to assess corruption in a country, we identify 10 corruption indices and evaluate their effect on these three sources of foreign capital and GDP growth. We applied different econometric methods. For comparative purposes, we provide results under ordinary least square (OLS), and subsequently complete the analysis under two-stage-least square (2SLS) and a generalized method of moments (GMM) to address possible endogeneity bias in the results. We find that FDI and remittances are important factors explaining economic growth, and their effects are enhanced after controlling for corruption. We also find that a foreign capital treated independently in a regression analysis would produce over-valuated parameters. For instance, the effect of FDI on economic growth is consistently smaller when incorporating remittances and foreign aid in the model. As expected, some corruption indices provide stronger explanatory power than others; thus, empirical researchers should use caution when selectively employing these indices. The results in this study lead to the relevance of corruption in explaining poor economic performance in developing countries. Nonetheless, it would be simplistic on our part to recommend countries to combat institutional corruption. To undertake this task requires large financial resources and a political will to produce changes within the political and regulatory systems. It would also require some degree of assistance from international organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Karla Borja, 2017. "External financial flows and economic growth in the SADC region: An Application of the Granger Causality Test in Panel Data Model," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(4), pages 95-107, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:95-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/662831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foreign direct investment; official aid; remittances; corruption indices;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F24 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Remittances
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:95-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.