Author
Abstract
Investments on African stock markets have grown over the years. This is because stock markets in Africa have realized increase in market capitalization, membership, value and volume traded. Notwithstanding these increases, empirical studies on informational efficiency have had mixed conclusions about the markets. Are these mixed conclusions a result of variations in study characteristics? This study aims to find out if study characteristics have a probability of concluding efficiency of African stock markets. We quantitatively reviewed previous studies of informational efficiency of African stock markets by means of meta-analysis. We employed the mixed effect logistic meta-regression model to examine which of the study characteristics is significant in concluding a market to be efficient. The mixed effect logistic model was chosen because it contains both fixed effects and random effects. The model explains an outcome as a linear combination of fixed and conditional random effects. The fixed effects assume equal influence of explanatory variables on an outcome whilst the random effects assume variations amongst observations when analyzing relationships between an outcome and explanatory variables. Our results showed that only the indicator for publication bias is significant at the 5% level and that none of the study characteristics is significant in concluding efficiency of African stock markets. The indicator for publication bias being significant means our analysis suffers from publication bias. This implies that there has been a change in attitude in recent years towards studies on informational market efficiency whose results do not validate the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) unlike the earlier years when the EMH was formulated and acclaimed to be one of the best propositions in economics. Though, none of the study characteristics was statistically significant in efficiency conclusions, we observed that stock markets in Africa are about 4 times more likely to conclude that the markets are efficient if the study tested the weak-form rather than the semi-strong form of the EMH. The results have important implications in that, efficiency conclusions of African stock markets do not depend on any of these study characteristics. Therefore, traders cannot devise strategies to outperform the markets based on any of these study characteristics. We therefore conclude that informational efficiency conclusions of African stock markets are context-specific which occurs randomly and not based on any of the study characteristics.
Suggested Citation
Emmanuel Numapau Gyamfi & Kwabena A. Kyei & Ryan Gill, 2017.
"Market efficiency of African stock markets: A Meta-Analysis,"
Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(4), pages 69-80, October-D.
Handle:
RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:69-80
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
- D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
- G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
- G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:69-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.