IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue5pp453-460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cheap IPO: Does it matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Othman Yong

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

It can be argued that a cheaply priced IPO would attract more potential buyers, especially small or retail investors as they are commonly known in Malaysia, which could result in more speculative trading activities due to its “cheap” perception. A fixed-price IPO serves a unique situation in which the price of an IPO is fixed prior to its offering to potential buyers, and it gives the opportunity to test whether or not a cheaply priced IPO can attract more potential buyers which can result in more speculative trading activities, hence higher initial return and price spread. This study examines a sample of 104 Malaysian fixed-price IPOs from January 2009 to December 2014, where I test the relationship between cheaply priced IPOs and their initial returns and also their price spreads during the first day of trading. I hypothesize that a cheaply priced IPO will attract more potential investors (especially the small or retail investors) that will result in a more speculative trading activity that will later push the IPO price higher in the secondary market. A speculative trading activity will also result in a higher price spread, which refers to the difference between the highest and the lowest price. The same situation occurs with regard to trading board, where investors (especially retail investors) are usually more attracted to cheaply priced IPOs, which are associated with IPOs listed on the ACE Market of Bursa Malaysia which caters for small, young and technology companies. As noted by Lowry et al. (2010), IPOs of small, young and technology firms are more difficult to value due to higher information asymmetry between the issuer and the investors, and thus we would expect higher price spread in these IPOs. In general, the results show that IPOs with low offer price and IPOs listed on the ACE Market have higher initial returns and higher price spreads compared to IPOs with high offer price and IPOs listed on the Main Market. The result of this study implies that investors can benefit significantly from investing in IPOs with low offer price. Investors can also benefit from investing in IPOs listed on the ACE Market, which is associated with low-priced IPOs. The implication to the regulatory bodies of Bursa Malaysia is that they should pay closer attention to IPOs with low offer price, and IPOs listed on the ACE Market because these IPOs are subject to speculative trading activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Othman Yong, 2016. "Cheap IPO: Does it matter?," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(5), pages 453-460, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:453-460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/619679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chew Xin-Er & Ng Sin Huei & Ong Tze San & Teh Boon Heng, 2020. "Underpinning Theories of IPO Underpricing: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(10), pages 560-573, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Malaysian IPOs; fixed-price IPOs; offer price; size effect; IPO under-pricing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:453-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.